| Dyract与玻璃离子水门汀治疗楔状缺损的疗效比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 林希鸿.Dyract与玻璃离子水门汀治疗楔状缺损的疗效比较[J].上海口腔医学,1999,8(2):82-83. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 林希鸿 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 福建医科大学附属第一医院口腔科 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的对Ｄｙｒａｃｔ与玻璃离子水门汀（ＧＩＣ）治疗楔状缺损的临床疗效进行比较。方法用Ｄｙｒａｃｔ充填９２例３１２颗楔状缺损的患牙，ＧＩＣ充填１４５例３４６颗患牙，定期随访两年，观察形态、密合度、边缘着色、色泽、继发龋、牙龈炎症、牙髓反应七个方面的治疗效果。结果半年内两者临床效果无差异（Ｐ＞０．０５），１年后有显著差异（Ｐ＜０．０５），２年后有高度显著差异（Ｐ＜０．００５）。且Ｄｙｒａｃｔ在形态、色泽、密合度、继发龋、牙龈炎症等５个方面均优于ＧＩＣ（Ｐ＜０．０５），其中以前两者为甚（Ｐ＜０．００５）。结论Ｄｙｒａｃｔ的远期疗效优于ＧＩＣ。
|
| 关 键 词： | Dyract 玻璃离子水门汀 楔状缺损 |
The comparision of clinical effects between Dyract complex and glass ionomer cement(GIC)
treatment of wedgeshaped defect |
| |
| Lin Xihong.The comparision of clinical effects between Dyract complex and glass ionomer cement(GIC)
treatment of wedgeshaped defect[J].Shanghai Journal of Stomatology,1999,8(2):82-83. |
| |
| Authors: | Lin Xihong |
| |
| Institution: | Department of Stomatology,First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou 350005,China. |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To evaluate the
curative effects of Dyractand Glass ionomer cement treating wedgeshaped defects. Methods92
patients with 312 teeth wedgeshaped defects were filled with Dyract and 145 patients with 346
teeth were filled with glass ionomer cement(GIC).The curative effect as to the shape,adaptation,
edge coloring,tint,secondary caries,pulp electrical test and gingivitis were observed regularly
for 2 years. Results There was no difference between two groups in half a year (P>0.05),but it
showed significant difference after one year (P<0.05)and highly dramatic difference after two
years (P<0.005). The curative effect of Dyract was obviously better than that of GIC in shape,tint,
adaptation,secondary caries and gingivitis. Conclusion The longterm curative effect of Dyract
was better than that of GIC. |
| |
| Keywords: | Dyractglass ionomer cement(GIC)wedgeshaped defect |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
