交锁髓内钉与钢板内固定治疗胫骨、股骨骨折的疗效对比分析 |
| |
引用本文: | 李小龙.交锁髓内钉与钢板内固定治疗胫骨、股骨骨折的疗效对比分析[J].中国当代医药,2011,18(26):37-38. |
| |
作者姓名: | 李小龙 |
| |
作者单位: | 四川省邛崃市医疗中心医院骨科,四川邛崃,611530 |
| |
摘 要: | 目的:比较胫骨、股骨骨折应用交锁髓内钉与钢板内固定2种治疗方案的优越性。方法:对159例胫骨、股骨骨折患者采用交锁髓内钉治疗,选同期行钢板内固定治疗患者74例,进行疗效观察。结果:两组愈合时间、负重时间、膝关节动度以及踝关节动度比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);观察组术后并发症有感染3例,膝关节疼痛2例,骨折延迟愈合3例;对照组内固定松动4例,感染4例,断钉2例,膝关节疼痛4例,骨折延迟愈合3例,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:胫骨、股骨骨折交锁髓内钉治疗较钢板内固定有较多的优越性。
|
关 键 词: | 胫骨 股骨骨折 交锁髓内钉 骨折愈合 疗效 |
Curative effect analysis of interlocking nail and plate internal fixation for tibial,femoral fracture |
| |
Authors: | LI Xiaolong |
| |
Institution: | LI Xiaolong Department of Orthopaedic,Qionglai Hospital Medical Center of Sichuan Province,Qionglai 611530,China |
| |
Abstract: | Objective: To compare the tibia and femur fractures with interlocking nail fixation of the superiority of the two treatment. Methods: 159 patients with tibial and femoral fractures were treated with interlocking intramedullary nail treatment, selection line and plate fixation over the same period 74 patients were patients. Results: The two group's healing time, loading time, the knee and ankle mobility mobility difference was significant difference (P〈0.05); observed postoperative complications in 3 cases of infection, knee pain was 2 cases, delayed healing in 3 cases; the control group g cases of loosening, infection in 4 cases, 2 cases of breakage, knee pain in 4 cases, 3 cases of delayed union of fractures, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion: The tibia, femur fractures treated with interlocking intramedullary nail plate more than the advantages. |
| |
Keywords: | Tibia femoral fractures Intramedullary nail Fracture healing Curative effect |
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|