| 原子吸收法和甲醛肟法检测发锰含量结果的对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 闫震. 原子吸收法和甲醛肟法检测发锰含量结果的对比[J]. 职业与健康, 2007, 23(24): 2266-2267 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 闫震 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 江苏省徐州市疾病预防控制中心,221006 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的研究确定火焰原子吸收法替代甲醛肟法测定发锰的可行性。方法取不同锰含量的头发样品,分别进行火焰原子吸收法和甲醛肟法检测,对结果进行对比。结果这2种方法检测结果的配对t检验,t=0.286,P>0.05。其结果差异无统计学意义。结论火焰原子吸收法在发锰的检测中可以替代甲醛肟法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 火焰原子吸收法 甲醛肟法 检测 发锰 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-1257（2007）24-2266-02 |
| 收稿时间： | 2007-05-13 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-05-13 |
Comparison between Atomic Absorption Method and Formaldehyde Method in Determining Manganese Contents in Hair |
| |
| YAN Zhen. Comparison between Atomic Absorption Method and Formaldehyde Method in Determining Manganese Contents in Hair[J]. Occupation and Health, 2007, 23(24): 2266-2267 |
| |
| Authors: | YAN Zhen |
| |
| Affiliation: | Xuzhou Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Jiangsu , 221006, China |
| |
| Abstract: | [Objective] To explore the feasibility of using flame atomic absorption method instead of formaldehyde method to determine manganese in hair.[Methods] 20 hair samples with different manganese contents were collected and determined with the two methods;the results were compared.[Results] No significant difference was found in the result(P>0.05).[Conclusion] Formaldehyde method can be used to replace flame atomic absorption method in the determination of manganese in hair. |
| |
| Keywords: | Flame atomic absorption method Formaldehyde method Detection Manganese in hair |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
