首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Reliability,validity and responsiveness of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for the neck
Authors:Marco Monticone  Simona Ferrante  Serena Maggioni  Gisel Grenat  Giovanni A. Checchia  Marco Testa  Marco G. Teli  Anne F. Mannion
Affiliation:1. Operative Unit of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Scientific Institute of Lissone, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, Institute of Care and Research (IRCCS), Via Monsignor Bernasconi, 16, 20035, Lissone (Milan), Italy
2. Neuroengineering and Medical Robotics Laboratory, Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
4. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Santa Corona Hospital, Pietra Ligure, Italy
5. Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Riabilitazione, Genetica, Oftalmologia e Scienze Materno-Infantili, Genova University, Savona, Italy
6. Department of Orthopaedics, Regional Hospital, Legnano, Italy
7. Spine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland
Abstract:

Purpose

Evaluation of the psychometric properties of a cross-culturally adapted questionnaire, the Core Outcome Measurement Index for neck pain (COMI-neck).

Methods

The COMI-neck was cross-culturally adapted for the Italian language using established procedures. The following psychometric properties of the instrument were then assessed in patients with chronic neck pain undergoing rehabilitation: test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC); construct validity by comparing COMI-neck with the Neck Pain and Disability Scale, a numerical pain rating scale, and the EuroQol-Five Dimension (Pearson’s correlations); and responsiveness by means of Standardized Response Mean (SRM), unpaired t tests, and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves.

Results

The questionnaire was completed by 103 subjects. The COMI-neck summary score displayed no relevant floor or ceiling effects. Test–retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.87). With one exception (symptom-specific well-being), the individual COMI items and the COMI summary score correlated to the expected extent with the scores of the reference questionnaires (r = 0.40–0.80). The mean change scores for the Italian COMI-neck differed significantly between patients with a good global outcome and those with a poor outcome (p = 0.002); SRM for the good outcome group was 1.23, and for the poor outcome group 0.40. ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.73 (95 % CI: 0.62–0.85).

Conclusions

This study provides evidence that the Italian version of the COMI-neck is a valid and responsive questionnaire in the population of patients examined. Its use is recommended for clinical and research purposes.
Keywords:COMI-neck   Outcome   Rehabilitation   Chronic neck pain
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号