首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

宫颈局麻人流术与静脉麻醉人流术疗效分析
引用本文:张秀萍,.宫颈局麻人流术与静脉麻醉人流术疗效分析[J].中国医学工程,2012(12):30+33-30,33.
作者姓名:张秀萍  
作者单位:大庆油田总医院集团五官医院
摘    要:目的探讨宫颈局麻与静脉麻醉在人流术中的疗效。方法选择宫内妊娠6.5-10W要求终止妊娠的妇女350例,随机分为二组,A组为宫颈局部注射利多卡因人流术172例;B组为静脉注射异丙酚人流术182例,对两组疗效进行比较。结果两组镇痛效果、手术时间、人流综合反应发生率无明显差异,不良反应发生率差异显著。结论宫颈局麻人流术适合基层医院开展,静脉麻醉人流术在基层医院中谨慎开展。

关 键 词:宫颈局麻  静脉麻醉  人流术

The analysis of clinical therapeutic effect of the cervical local anesthesia operation flow and intravenous anesthesia operation flow
ZHANG Xiu-ping.The analysis of clinical therapeutic effect of the cervical local anesthesia operation flow and intravenous anesthesia operation flow[J].China Medical Engineering,2012(12):30+33-30,33.
Authors:ZHANG Xiu-ping
Institution:ZHANG Xiu-ping(Daqing General Hospital Group Oilfield General Hospital Group Facial Features Hospital,Daqing,Heilongjiang 163416,P.R.China)
Abstract:【Objective】To explore clinical therapeutic effect of the Cervical local anesthesia operation flow and intravenous anesthesia operation flow.【Methods】Choosing IUP 6.5-10W need termination pregnancy women 350 case,and we random divided two groups A and B.A Group is 172 case who using cervical local anesthesia operation flow with lidocaine.B Group is182 case who using intravenous anesthesia operation flow with diprivan.And comparing these two groups.【Resluts】Two groups of analgesic effect,operation time,operation flow comprehensive reaction rate have no obvious difference.But adverse reaction has the significant difference.【Conclusion】Cervical local anesthesia operation flow is suitable for primary hospital,and intravenous anesthesia operation flow should be cautious in primary hospital.
Keywords:cervical local anesthesia  intravenous anesthesia  operation flow
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国医学工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国医学工程》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号