首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

3.0T动态增强磁共振对前列腺癌的定量分析研究
引用本文:刘会佳,赵娓娓,任芳,黄旭方,李娜,侯炜寰,潘奇,任静,宦怡.3.0T动态增强磁共振对前列腺癌的定量分析研究[J].放射学实践,2014(5):477-481.
作者姓名:刘会佳  赵娓娓  任芳  黄旭方  李娜  侯炜寰  潘奇  任静  宦怡
作者单位:710032 西安,第四军医大学西京医院放射科
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81370039);西京医院临床高新技术新业务助推项目(XJGX13LC11)
摘    要:目的:探讨3.0T磁共振动态增强(DCE-MRI)定量分析对前列腺癌的诊断价值,并评价Ktrans与Gleason评分的相关性。方法:回顾性分析40例经病理证实的前列腺疾病患者的病例资料,其中前列腺癌(PC)患者28例,前列腺增生(BPH)患者12例,每例患者均行常规MRI和DCE—MRI检查,通过与病理结果对照,在MRI图像上共选取130个样本,分为前列腺癌区、外周带非癌区和中央腺体非癌区三组,在前列腺定量参数伪彩图上取ROI并测量Ktrans、Ve及Kep值,对三组的各参数值分别行方差分析,并检验PC组Ktrans。值与Gleason评分的相关性。结果:前列腺癌区的Ktrans、ve及Kep值分别为(0.62±0.10)min-1、(0.44±0.12)和(1.45±0.25)min,外周带非癌区分别为(0.21±0.06)min-1、(0.29±0.65)和(0.76±0.21)min-1,中央区非癌区分别为(0.32±0.09)min、(0.34±0.70)和(0.95±0.26)min-1,Ktrans、Ve及Kep值在各组间差异均有统计学意义(F值分别为234.338、32.593及92.462,P值均〈0.05);PC组Ktrans、Ve值在不同Gleason评分组间差异有统计学意义(F值分别为6.354、9.217,P值均〈0.05),Kep值在不同Gleason评分组间差异无统计学意义(P值〉0.05);前列腺癌区的Ktrans值与Gleason评分呈正相关(r=0.533,P〈0.05)。结论:3.0TDCE-MRI定量分析研究能为PC的诊断提供客观依据。前列腺癌区的Ktrans值与Gleason评分呈正相关,提示定量参数Ktrans值可用于评估PC的恶性程度。

关 键 词:前列腺肿瘤  磁共振成像  前列腺增生

Quantitative diagnostic value of DCE-MRI in prostatic cancer
Institution:LIU Hui-jia, ZHAO Wei-wei,REN Fang, et al. (Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, P. R. China)
Abstract:Objective:To study the diagnostic value of quantitative analysis parameters of DCE-MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer and to evaluate the correlation between Kt and Gleason scores. Methods: Forty patients with pathologically proved prostate diseases underwent conventional MRI and DCE-MR examinations. They were divided into three groups : cancerous loci, noncancerous area in the peripheral zone and central gland. ROIs were drawn on areas of prostate tissue to measure the values of Ktrans, Vo and Kep. The 3 parameters in the different groups were analyzed, and the correlations between K and Gleason scores were studied. Results:The Ktrans ,Ve and Kep valuesof cancerous loci were (0.62±0.10)/min, (0.44 ± 0. 12) and ( 1.45± 0. 25 )/min, respectively, while, for noncancerous area in the peripheral zone were (0. 21± 0.06)/min, (0.29 ± 0.65 ), (0.76±0.21)/min, respectively, and for noncancerous area in the central gland were (0.32 ± 0.09)/rain, (0.34±0.70), (0.95±0.26 )/min, respectively. The differences between K , Vo and Kep values of the three groups were statistically significant (F= 234. 338,32. 593 and 92. 462, respectively; P〈0.05). Significant correlation was found between K and Gleason score (r= 0. 533, P〈0.05). Conclusion: The differences of K , Vo and Kep among the three groups (cancerous foci,noncancerous area in the peripheral zone and central gland) are statistically significant. 3.0T DCE-MRI quantitative analysis plays an important role in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Positive correlation is found be- tween K and Gleason score. Ktrans can be used for evaluating the degree of malignancy of prostate cancer.
Keywords:Prostate neoplasms  Magnetic resonance imaging  Prostatic hyperplasia
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《放射学实践》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《放射学实践》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号