首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

4种非甾体抗炎药治疗类风湿关节炎的成本-效果分析
引用本文:施文,王永铭,李端,李少丽,颜敏,陈斌艳,程能能. 4种非甾体抗炎药治疗类风湿关节炎的成本-效果分析[J]. 中国新药与临床杂志, 2004, 23(8): 513-517
作者姓名:施文  王永铭  李端  李少丽  颜敏  陈斌艳  程能能
作者单位:1. 复旦大学药学院,药理教研室,上海,200032
2. 国家食品与药品监督管理局,药品评价中心和药物不良反应监控中心,北京,100061
基金项目:国家食品药品监督管理局资助项目,药物不良反应监控中心资助项目
摘    要:目的 :探讨 4种口服非甾体抗炎药治疗类风湿性关节炎 6mo的成本和效果。方法 :4 6 1例病人随机分成 4组 ,双氯芬酸组 131例 ,服用双氯芬酸 75~ 10 0mg·d- 1,萘丁美酮组 131例 ,服用萘丁美酮 10 0 0mg·d- 1,美洛昔康组 14 4例 ,服用美洛昔康 15mg·d- 1,塞来昔布组 5 5例 ,服用塞来昔布 2 0 0mg·d- 1,疗程均为 6mo。运用成本 -效果分析对 4组病人进行分析评价。结果 :双氯芬酸、萘丁美酮、美洛昔康、塞来昔布 4组完成疗程病例数分别为12 5 ,12 7,139和 5 5例。在疗程结束时 ,4组间疗效无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5 ) ,塞来昔布组不良反应率明显低于其他 3组 (P <0 .0 1)。 4组总成本分别为(14 0 0±s 32 6 ) ,(15 31± 36 ) ,(2 0 18± 5 2 7) ,(32 2 5±76 7)元 ;成本 -效果比为 (2 0 4 1± 6 12 ) ,(2 5 6 0±6 81) ,(2 985± 70 6 ) ,(4 6 6 7± 1389)元·例 - 1;经敏感度分析后的成本 -效果比为 (1896± 4 5 5 ) ,(2 36 6±6 38) ,(2 6 6 9± 5 89) ,(3978± 96 3)元·例 - 1。结论 :双氯芬酸为治疗类风湿性关节炎的较佳方案 ,在经济许可的情况下 ,偏重考虑药物安全性 ,塞来昔布也是一个较佳选择。

关 键 词:关节炎,类风湿  消炎药,非甾类  经济学,药学  成本及成本分析  费用效益分析
文章编号:1007-7669(2004)08-0513-05

Cost-effectiveness analysis of 4 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for rheumatoid arthritis
SHI Wen ,WANG Yong-ming ,LI Duan ,LI Shao-li ,YAN Min ,CHEN Bin-yan ,CHENG Neng-neng .. Cost-effectiveness analysis of 4 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies, 2004, 23(8): 513-517
Authors:SHI Wen   WANG Yong-ming   LI Duan   LI Shao-li   YAN Min   CHEN Bin-yan   CHENG Neng-neng .
Affiliation:SHI Wen 1,WANG Yong-ming 1,LI Duan 1,LI Shao-li 2,YAN Min 2,CHEN Bin-yan 1,CHENG Neng-neng 1.
Abstract:AIM: To evaluate the cost and efficacy of 4 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the 6 mo treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Four hundred and sixty-one patients were randomly divided into 4 groups. One hundred and thirty-one patients of diclofenac group took diclofenac 75-100mg·d -1 . One hundred and thirty-one patients of nabumetone group took nabumetone 1000mg·d -1 . One hundred and forty-four patients of meloxicam group took meloxicam 15mg·d -1 . Fifty-five patients of celecoxib group took celecoxib 200mg·d -1 . The course of treatment was 6mo. Cost-effectiveness analysis was used to evaluate the cost and efficacy of four groups. RESULTS: There were 125,127,139,and 55 patients finished the study in diclofenac group,nabumetone group,meloxicam group and celecoxib group,respectively.There was no significant difference in the clinical efficacy of four groups ( P > 0.05 ) at the end of the study. The adverse reaction rate of celecoxib group was significantly lower than that of the other 3 groups( P <0.01). The total cost of 4 groups was (1400± s 326),( 1531± 36),(2018±527), and (3225±767) yuan,respectively. The cost-effectiveness ratios of curing per patient were (2041±612),(2560±681),(2985±706), and (4667±1389) yuan,respectively and became (1896±455),(2366±638),(2669±589),(3978±963) yuan after sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: Diclofenac is an inexpensive and effective drug for RA. If budget allows, and considering drug safety,celecoxib is also an appropriate choice.
Keywords:arthritis  rheumatoid  anti-inflammatory agents  non-steroidal  economics  pharmaceutical  costs and cost analysis  cost-benefit analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号