Improvement of burn pain management through routine pain monitoring and pain management protocol

Introduction

Pain management is an important aspect of burn management. We developed a routine pain monitoring system and pain management protocol for burn patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of our new pain management system.

Methods

From May 2011 to November 2011, the prospective study was performed with 107 burn patients. We performed control group (n = 58) data analysis and then developed the pain management protocol and monitoring system. Next, we applied our protocol to patients and performed protocol group (n = 49) data analysis, and compared this to control group data. Data analysis was performed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of background pain and procedural pain, Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Scale (STAIS), and Holmes and Rahe Stress Scale (HRSS).

Results

The NRS of background pain for the protocol group was significantly decreased compared to the control group (2.8 ± 2.0 versus 3.9 ± 1.9), and the NRS of procedural pain of the protocol group was significantly decreased compared to the control group (4.8 ± 2.8 versus 3.7 ± 2.5). CAPS and HDRS were decreased in the protocol group, but did not have statistical significance. STAIS and HRSS were decreased in the protocol group, but only the STAIS had statistical significance.

Conclusion

Our new pain management system was effective in burn pain management. However, adequate pain management can only be accomplished by a continuous and thorough effort. Therefore, pain control protocol and pain monitoring systems need to be under constant revision and improvement using creative ideas and approaches.