Incidence of sore throat in children following use of flexible laryngeal mask airways – impact of an introducer device |
| |
Authors: | ANTHEA WILLIAM NEIL A. CHAMBERS THOMAS O. ERB BRITTA S. Von UNGERN‐STERNBERG |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Anesthesia, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Australia;2. Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital for Children, Basel, Switzerland;3. School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia;4. Division of Clinical Sciences, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
Section Editor: Charles Cote |
| |
Abstract: | Background: Insertion of a flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) is more difficult and therefore might result in a higher risk for trauma to the upper airway. To facilitate the insertion of FLMA, the use of an introducer device (Portex Limited, Hythe, Kent, UK) was promoted. However, the impact of the use of this device on the occurrence of postoperative sore throat is unknown. Methods: Four hundred children (3–21 years) undergoing elective ambulatory surgery were consecutively included in this study. In 196 cases, the FLMA was inserted using an introducer device. The FLMA cuff was then inflated and the pressure adjusted to below 60 cmH2O (according to manufacturers guidelines) using a calibrated cuff manometer (Portex Limited). Three types of FLMA were available: FLMA classic, FLMA unique (both FLMA PacMed, Richmond, Victoria, Australia) and FLMA ProBreathe (Well Lead Medical Co Ltd., Hualong, Guangzhou, China). Prior to discharge, patients’ pain was assessed using an age appropriate scale. Results: Thirteen children (3.3%) developed sore throat, two (0.5%) sore neck and three (0.75%) sore jaw. Of those that developed sore throat, seven had a FLMA inserted with an introducer, six without an introducer. Using a laryngeal mask airways (LMA) with a polyvinyl chloride (PVC), surface was associated with a higher risk for sore throat compared with an LMA with a silicone surface (P = 0.0002). Conclusion: In this study with controlled low cuff pressures, the incidence of sore throat was low. The use of an introducer device did not affect the rate of sore throat. |
| |
Keywords: | laryngeal mask airway sore throat introducer device airway morbidity paediatric anaesthesia |
|
|