首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于加权TOPSIS法评价血必净注射液临床应用的合理性
引用本文:余应嘉,叶淑芳,邓燕芳,郑依玲,欧阳勇. 基于加权TOPSIS法评价血必净注射液临床应用的合理性[J]. 中国医院药学杂志, 2021, 41(15): 1546-1550. DOI: 10.13286/j.1001-5213.2021.15.12
作者姓名:余应嘉  叶淑芳  邓燕芳  郑依玲  欧阳勇
作者单位:广州市中西医结合医院药学部, 广东 广州 510800
基金项目:广东省中医药局中医药科研项目(编号:20212182);广东省十三五中医重点专科(临床药学)建设项目(粤中医函[2019]472号)
摘    要:目的:基于加权TOPSIS法对血必净注射液临床使用情况进行分析与评价,为中药临床药师科学评价血必净注射液应用合理性建立评价标准,为临床合理用药提供依据.方法:参考血必净注射液说明书、《中药注射剂临床使用基本原则》、相关指南、专家共识及文献,制定血必净注射液合理应用评价细则,并采用加权TOPSIS法对某院2020年1-1...

关 键 词:加权TOPSIS法  血必净注射液  合理性评价
收稿时间:2021-03-08

Evaluation of clinical application rationality of Xuebijing injection based upon weighted TOPSIS method
YU Ying-jia,YE Shu-fang,DENG Yan-fang,ZHENG Yi-ling,OUYANG Yong. Evaluation of clinical application rationality of Xuebijing injection based upon weighted TOPSIS method[J]. Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 2021, 41(15): 1546-1550. DOI: 10.13286/j.1001-5213.2021.15.12
Authors:YU Ying-jia  YE Shu-fang  DENG Yan-fang  ZHENG Yi-ling  OUYANG Yong
Affiliation:Department of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional & West Medicine, Guangdong Guangzhou 510800, China
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To evaluate the rationality of Xuebijing injection use at our hospital based upon weighted TOPSIS method to establish the evaluation criteria of Xuebijing injection by clinical pharmacists of traditional Chinese Medicine and provide references for its rational clinical use.METHODS Referring to the package insert of Xuebijing injection, the basic principles of clinical use of traditional Chinese medicine injection, the relevant guidelines, expert consensus and literature sources, the evaluation rules were formulated for the rational application of Xuebijing injection. The weighted TOPSIS method was employed for evaluating a total of 266 archived medical records of Xuebijing injection at our hospital from January to December 2020.RESULTS Among 266 files, the lowest evaluation score was combination medication(4.51%) and the highest evaluation scores were incompatibility(100%) and adverse reaction and treatment (100%). There were 3 cases (1.13%) with a relative proximity degree of >90%, 183 cases (68.79%) with a relative proximity degree of 80%-90%, 60 cases (22.56%) with a relative proximity degree of 70%-80%, 8 cases (3.01%) with a relative proximity degree of 60%-70% and 12 cases (4.51%) with a relative proximity degree of <60%.CONCLUSION The evaluation method for the rationality of Xuebijing injection has been established based upon weighted TOPSIS method. Combining multiple evaluation parameters, it has a strong operability and the evaluation results are both reliable and intuitive. It provides a methodological tool for pre-prescription reviews and further improving the quality control of clinical rational use of Chinese medicine injection.
Keywords:weighted TOPSIS method  Xuebijing injection  rationality evaluation  
点击此处可从《中国医院药学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国医院药学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号