A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Pulmonary Hypertension

Background

The diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for pulmonary hypertension (PH) compared with right heart catheterization were assessed. The purpose of this systematic review was to comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CMR in evaluating PH.

Methods

Published literature was obtained from PUBMED, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane library, Embase, Biosis Preview, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chongqing VIP databases, and all studies were inclusive until December 2012. Studies relevant to PH and its imaging in CMR and right heart catheterization were included if correlation coefficient was elucidated clearly. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) score was used to assess the quality of studies. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled separately and compared with overall accuracy measures: diagnostic odds ratio and symmetric summary receiver operating characteristic.

Results

Sixteen studies were included in the systematic review. Of all the studies, the most widely used index was ventricular mass index (VMI) of CMR. We performed a meta-analysis for VMI among 429 patients in 5 individual studies, which showed a modest diagnostic accuracy of VMI for PH with a summary sensitivity and specificity of 84% (95% confidence interval, 79%-87%) and 82% (95% confidence interval, 73%-89%), respectively. In addition, the summary positive likelihood ratio was 4.894, indicating that VMI of CMR allows a modest ability to distinguish PH patients from healthy subjects with a cutoff point of 0.45 using functional and structural measures.

Conclusions

This systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that VMI seems to have a moderate sensitivity and specificity for detection of PH. The application values of other parameters still need further investigation.