不同来源的表皮干细胞促进皮肤创面愈合的研究

目的 观察表皮干细胞(ESCs)及去分化来源的表皮干细胞(DESCs)对皮肤创面愈合的促进作用及其异同.方法 由新鲜人包皮标本以贴壁法分离ESCs,随机分为3组,第1组作为原代ESCs:第2组传代培养至第6代时可见细胞成熟呈表皮细胞(ECs)形态,由原来的大克隆生长的小圆细胞形态变为较为肥大的不规则型细胞,无法形成克隆样增殖;其细胞表型也由β1整合素、CK19强阳性、CK10阴性变为β1整合素、CK19阴性,而CK10强阳性,予以100μg/L的碱性成纤维细胞生长因子(bFGF)培养48 h进行去分化诱导,48 h后ECs周边开始出现小圆细胞并呈克隆样生长,β1整合素、CK19、CK10等细胞表型也趋于与ESCs一致,即DESCs;第3组传代培养至第6代获得ECs.3组细胞皆以D-Hanks液重悬调其终质量浓度为2×106个/ml.将12只裸鼠每只背部左右各制备1个直径6 mm创面,共24个创面.将全部创面随机等分为4组,每组6个,分别以ESCs、DESCs、Ecs及生理盐水(NS)各0.2 ml进行创面注射.于术后0、3、7 d测量创面面积进行统计学分析,并于术后7 d行创面取材苏木素-伊红(HE)染色.结果 ESCs组与DESCs组在术后3 d时创面面积分别为(11.758±2.544)、(11.515±1.351)mm2,7 d时创面面积分别为(1.795±1.063)、(2.043±1.138)mm2,修复速度要明显快于ECs组与NS组[3 d时创面面积分别为(17.857±1.722)、(16.192±2.256)mm2,7 d时创面面积分别为(5.367±1.219)、(5.070±1.357)mm2,P＜0.01];而ESCs与DESCs组之间创面修复速度比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);ECs组与NS组之间比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).HE染色提示ESCs组与DESCs组的创面愈合质量优于ECs组与NS组,可见有皮肤附属腺的再生且纤维瘢痕组织较少.结论 ESCs与DESCs皆有促进创面愈合的作用,相互之间无明显差异.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the enhancing effect of epithelial stem cells (ESCs) and dedifferentiation derived epithelial stem cells (DESCs) in the healing of epidermal wound. Methods ESCs were isolated from the fresh circumcised foreskins by using adherence method and randomly divided into three cohorts: ESCs cohort, DESCs cohort and epithelial cells (ECs) cohort. The final cell density was adjusted to 2 × 106/ml with D-Hanks in each group. The model of BALB/C mice full-thickness skin loss wounds was established. Two circular 6 mm-diameter skin loss wounds were cut on every BALB/C mouse back. Twenty-four wounds of 12 BALB/C mice were divided equally and randomly into 4 groups:DESCs, ESCs, ECs and NS. The cell suspensions of DESCs, ESCs and ECs were injected respectively into the wound edges with the density of 2 × 106/ml. And the volme was 0. 2 ml per treatment wound. The same volume of normal saline was injected in NS group. On the postoperative day 0, 3, 7, all of the wound areas were measured and analyzed statistically. On the postoperative 7 day, the sections were made and observed by using hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Results The wound areas in DESCs group and ESCs group were ( 11. 758 ± 2. 544) and ( 11.515 ± 1.351 ) mm2 on the 3rd day postoperatively, and ( 1. 795 ±1. 063) and (2. 043 ± 1. 138) mm2 on the 7th day postoperatively, respectively. The wound areas in ECs group and NS group were ( 17. 857 ± 1. 722) and ( 16. 192 ±2. 256) mm2 on the 3rd day postoperatively,and ( 1. 795 ± 1. 063) and (2. 043 ± 1. 138) mm2 on the 7th day postoperatively, respectively. There was statistically significant difference in wound area between ESCs or DESCs group and ECs, NS groups on the 3rd, 7th day postoperatively ( P ＜ 0. 01 ), but there was no statistically significant difference between DESCs and ESCs groups ( P ＞ 0. 05 ). HE staining showed the repairing quality of treatment wounds was superior to that in the control wounds, and regenerating glands and less fibrous connective tissues were seen in ESCs and EDSCs groups. Conclusion Both ESCs and DESCs could promote the wound repair.

Differently derived epithelial stem cells in healing of epidermal wound

Objective To investigate the enhancing effect of epithelial stem cells (ESCs) and dedifferentiation derived epithelial stem cells (DESCs) in the healing of epidermal wound. Methods ESCs were isolated from the fresh circumcised foreskins by using adherence method and randomly divided into three cohorts: ESCs cohort, DESCs cohort and epithelial cells (ECs) cohort. The final cell density was adjusted to 2 × 106/ml with D-Hanks in each group. The model of BALB/C mice full-thickness skin loss wounds was established. Two circular 6 mm-diameter skin loss wounds were cut on every BALB/C mouse back. Twenty-four wounds of 12 BALB/C mice were divided equally and randomly into 4 groups:DESCs, ESCs, ECs and NS. The cell suspensions of DESCs, ESCs and ECs were injected respectively into the wound edges with the density of 2 × 106/ml. And the volme was 0. 2 ml per treatment wound. The same volume of normal saline was injected in NS group. On the postoperative day 0, 3, 7, all of the wound areas were measured and analyzed statistically. On the postoperative 7 day, the sections were made and observed by using hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Results The wound areas in DESCs group and ESCs group were ( 11. 758 ± 2. 544) and ( 11.515 ± 1.351 ) mm2 on the 3rd day postoperatively, and ( 1. 795 ±1. 063) and (2. 043 ± 1. 138) mm2 on the 7th day postoperatively, respectively. The wound areas in ECs group and NS group were ( 17. 857 ± 1. 722) and ( 16. 192 ±2. 256) mm2 on the 3rd day postoperatively,and ( 1. 795 ± 1. 063) and (2. 043 ± 1. 138) mm2 on the 7th day postoperatively, respectively. There was statistically significant difference in wound area between ESCs or DESCs group and ECs, NS groups on the 3rd, 7th day postoperatively ( P ＜ 0. 01 ), but there was no statistically significant difference between DESCs and ESCs groups ( P ＞ 0. 05 ). HE staining showed the repairing quality of treatment wounds was superior to that in the control wounds, and regenerating glands and less fibrous connective tissues were seen in ESCs and EDSCs groups. Conclusion Both ESCs and DESCs could promote the wound repair.