超选择动脉溶栓治疗80岁以上脑梗死的安全性及疗效评估-两中心研究

目的 探讨80岁以上高龄脑梗死患者超选择动脉溶栓治疗的安全性、可行性及治疗效果.方法 回顾性分析86例超选择动脉溶栓治疗的脑梗死患者的临床资料,根据年龄不同分为高龄组(≥180岁,21例)和普通年龄组(<80岁,65例),并设对照组(同时期≥80岁未行动脉溶栓治疗患者,50例).评估患者动脉溶栓术后血管良好再通率、早期临床改善率,以及各组症状性脑出血发生率、较好转归率及死亡率.结果 接受动脉溶栓治疗的两组患者血管良好再通率、早期临床改善率及症状性脑出血发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.528,P=0.102,P=0.353).高龄组症状性脑出血发生率明显高于对照组,比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.034).高龄组较好转归率为42.9%,低于普通年龄组(50.8%),但高于对照组(16%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.042,P=0.017).高龄组死亡率与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(23.8%vs 28%,P=0.816),但高于普通年龄组,差异有统计学意义(23.8%vs 10.8%,P=0.034).结论 80岁以上高龄脑梗死患者超选择动脉溶栓治疗具有较高的安全性、可行性和临床疗效,高龄不是脑梗死动脉溶栓治疗的禁忌因素.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy on elderly patients (≥ 80 years old) with acute ischemic stroke. Methods The clinical data of 86 patients with acute ischemic stroke, received intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy, were retrospectively analyzed; according to age differences, these patients were divided into advanced age group (≥80 years old, n=21) and common age group (<80 years old, n=65); and control group (≥80 years old, not receiving thrombolytic therapy, n=50) was established. The recanalization rate and early clinical improvement rate, and the incidence, recover rate and death rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage were evaluated in these patients after treatment. Results No significant differences in the favorite recanalization rate and short-term outcome, and the incidence of symptom intracranial hemorrhage were noted between the advanced age group and common age group (P=0.528, P=0.102,P=0.353). The incidence of symptom intracranial hemorrhage in the advanced age group was obviously higher than that in the control group (P=0.034); the recover rate of symptom ntracranial hemorrhage in the advanced age group (42.9%) was obviously lower than that in the common age group (50.8%), but significantly higher than that in the control group (16%, P=0.042, P=0.017). The mortality of the advanced age group was similar to that of the control group (23.8% versus 28%, P=0.816), but higher than that of common age group (23.8% versus 10.8%, P=0.034). Conclusion Relatively high feasibility, safety and efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy are noted in elderly patients (≥80 years old) with acute ischemic stroke, demonstrating that the use of intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy in very elderly patients should not be avoided but pursued advisably.

Evaluation of safety and efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute stroke in gerontal patients: a two-center study

Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy on elderly patients (≥ 80 years old) with acute ischemic stroke. Methods The clinical data of 86 patients with acute ischemic stroke, received intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy, were retrospectively analyzed; according to age differences, these patients were divided into advanced age group (≥80 years old, n=21) and common age group (<80 years old, n=65); and control group (≥80 years old, not receiving thrombolytic therapy, n=50) was established. The recanalization rate and early clinical improvement rate, and the incidence, recover rate and death rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage were evaluated in these patients after treatment. Results No significant differences in the favorite recanalization rate and short-term outcome, and the incidence of symptom intracranial hemorrhage were noted between the advanced age group and common age group (P=0.528, P=0.102,P=0.353). The incidence of symptom intracranial hemorrhage in the advanced age group was obviously higher than that in the control group (P=0.034); the recover rate of symptom ntracranial hemorrhage in the advanced age group (42.9%) was obviously lower than that in the common age group (50.8%), but significantly higher than that in the control group (16%, P=0.042, P=0.017). The mortality of the advanced age group was similar to that of the control group (23.8% versus 28%, P=0.816), but higher than that of common age group (23.8% versus 10.8%, P=0.034). Conclusion Relatively high feasibility, safety and efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy are noted in elderly patients (≥80 years old) with acute ischemic stroke, demonstrating that the use of intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy in very elderly patients should not be avoided but pursued advisably.