首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Intraoperative sentinel lymph node evaluation: Optimizing surgical pathology practices in an era of changing clinical management
Institution:1. Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Avenue South CC-3322 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232-2561, United States;2. Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Avenue South CC-3322 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232-2561, United States;3. Yale University, Department of Pathology, 310 Cedar Street, PO Box 208023, New Haven, CT 06520-8023, United States;1. Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America;2. Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America;1. Department of Biochemistry, Dong-A University College of Medicine, 32 Daesingongwon-ro, Seo-Gu, Busan 49201, Republic of Korea;2. Department of Pathology, Dong-A University College of Medicine, 32 Daesingongwon-ro, Seo-Gu, Busan 49201, Republic of Korea;1. Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Largo do Terreiro de Jesus s/n, Federal University of Bahia, 40025010 Salvador, Brazil;2. Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos, Rua Augusto Viana, sn, Canela, Salvador 40110060, Brazil.
Abstract:Axillary lymph node status is an independent prognostic indicator in breast cancer. Intraoperative identification of metastatic carcinoma in sentinel lymph nodes may allow for concurrent axillary lymph node dissection at the time of primary tumor excision. A retrospective review of patients undergoing primary breast cancer excision with sentinel lymph node sampling was performed. Sensitivity and specificity of imprint cytology (touch prep) with and without the incorporation of gross evaluation was determined using permanent section results as the gold standard. Five hundred sixteen lymph nodes were analyzed by imprint cytology in 213 patients, and 203 lymph nodes were analyzed in 74 patients incorporating gross examination. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of macrometastases by touch prep alone were 60% and 99% respectively with 4 patients undergoing same-day axillary dissection for only micrometastatic disease. False negative causes included lack of transfer of malignant cells in 8 cases and misinterpretation of tumor cells in 6 cases. Incorporating gross examination in the modified protocol resulted in reduced sensitivity of 38%, but achieved the desired 100% specificity and positive predictive value. Imprint cytology alone did not reliably distinguish between micro- and macrometastatic disease. Gross assessment combined with imprint cytology allows for improved assessment of volume of axillary disease, but is an insensitive technique.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号