异基因外周造血干细胞移植与免疫抑制治疗重型再生障碍性贫血的临床比较

目的 比较异基因外周造血干细胞移植(Allo-PBSCT)与免疫抑制治疗(IST)重型再生障碍性贫血(SAA)的疗效与并发症.方法 25例SAA患者接受了两种方法治疗:PBSCT组12例接受了同胞HLA全相合的PBSCT,预处理方案为:环磷酰胺(Cy)联合兔抗人胸腺免疫球蛋白(ATG);IST组13例治疗方案为:ATG/环孢素A(CsA).比较两种治疗方法的近期疗效、远期疗效与并发症.结果 PBSCT组的中性粒细胞计数、Pt和Hb的恢复时间分别为(13.5±2.3)、(23.5±4.1)、(82.7±6.1)d]快于IST组分别为(32.6±3.5)、(73.8±6.2)、(296.4±12.5)d](P<0.05),但1年的近期疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组3年生存率和总生存率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),总复发率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 Allo-PBSCT和IST都是治疗SAA的有效手段,但Allo-PBSCT具有造血重建快、复发率低、并发症并没有增加等特点,临床上可作为优先选择.

Comparative study of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy for severe aplastic anemia

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and complications of allogeneic peripheral blood stern cell transplantation (Allo-PBSCT) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) for severe aplastic anemia(SAA). Methods Twenty-five patients with SAA underwent allogeneic HLA-matched sibling donor PBSCT(n = 12) and IST (n = 13). PBSCT group received conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamido(Cy) in combination with antithymocyte globulin(ATG). IST group received ATG followed by cyclosporine A (CsA).The short-term and long-term effects and complications were investigated. Results The mean time of recovery in the absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelet and hemoglobin (Hb) in PBSCT group (13.5±2.3), (23.5±4.1), (82.7±6.1)d, respectively]was shorter than those in IST group (32.6±3.5), (73.8±6.2), (296.4±12.5)d, respectively]and there were statistical differences between two groups(P<0.05). But the one-year treatment effect between two groups showed no difference (P>0.05). There were no statistical differences in 3-year survival and overall survival rate between two groups (P>0.05). However, statistical difference was observed in overall relapse rate (P<0.05). The common complication in two groups was virus infection including cytomegalovirus (CMV) and varicella zoster virus (VZV), but there was no statistical difference in the incidence of virus infection between them (P>0.05). Conclusions Both allo-PBSCT and IST are effective methods for treating patients with SAA. PBSCT is considered preferentially in clinic, because of its advantages in faster hematopoietic engraftment, lower relapse rate and no increased complication.