Pathology of borderline HER-2/neu breast carcinoma: a biologically distinct phenotype

SummaryPurpose The significance of HER-2/neu results obtained by immunohistochemical analyses (IHC) which are neither negative nor strongly positive is controversial. The incidence of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) positivity in these tumors is small and the implication is that these borderline results represent laboratory misclassification. We analyzed the tumor characteristics of these HER-2/neu borderline tumors to determine if they represent a unique tumor type.Methods HER-2/neu status was determined by image analysis (IA) of IHC sections in 669 cases of invasive breast cancer. Borderline cases were reflexed to FISH to determine gene status. HER-2/neu results were compared to tumor morphology and other tumor markers.Results HER-2/neu was negative, borderline and positive in 69.5, 15.8, and 14.6% of cases, respectively. HER-2/neu amplification was present in 17.3% of borderline cases. The borderline group is significantly different from the HER-2/neu positive group for all parameters studied except Ki-67. Compared to the HER-2/neu negative group, the borderline group showed a significantly higher HER-2/neu gene copy number and a trend towards lower progesterone receptor expression (p=0.058). Compared to the HER-2/neu negative group, the HER-2/neu borderline/FISH-negative group showed significantly lower PR expression. Compared to the HER-2/neu positive group, the HER-2/neu borderline/FISH positive group showed significant differences with multiple parameters.Conclusion Borderline HER-2/neu tumors are a unique tumor type and do not represent laboratory imprecision. Hormone receptor alterations are associated with early changes in HER-2/neu expression. While IA is capable of detecting these changes, current FISH methodology is not.