首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

万拉法新与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症对照观察
引用本文:叶青,顾小扬,刘建锋,赵义林. 万拉法新与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症对照观察[J]. 临床精神医学杂志, 2002, 12(2): 84-85
作者姓名:叶青  顾小扬  刘建锋  赵义林
作者单位:225003,江苏扬州五台山医院
摘    要:目的:比较万拉法新和帕罗西汀治疗门诊抑郁症的疗效和副反应。方法:将符合CCMD-2-R抑郁症诊断标准的患者随机分为两组,分别给予万拉法新及帕罗西汀治疗,治疗时间为周,使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、临床总体印象量表(CGI)、不良反应症状量表(TESS)进行评分。结果:两组有效率分别为80%和87%,在疗效和副反应方面两组差异无显著性。结论:万拉法新是一种疗效好而安全的抗抑郁药,适用于门诊抑郁症病人。

关 键 词:对照观察 抑郁症 万拉法新 帕罗西汀 治疗
文章编号:1005-3220(2002)02-0084-02
修稿时间:2001-08-29

A clinical control study of venlafaxine and paroxetine in the treatment of depression in outpatients
Ye qing,Gu Xiaoyang,Liu Jianfeng,et al.. A clinical control study of venlafaxine and paroxetine in the treatment of depression in outpatients[J]. Journal of Clinical Psychological Medicine, 2002, 12(2): 84-85
Authors:Ye qing  Gu Xiaoyang  Liu Jianfeng  et al.
Affiliation:Ye qing,Gu Xiaoyang,Liu Jianfeng,et al.Wutaishan Hospital of Yangzhou,Jiangsu 225003
Abstract:Objective:To compare clinical efficacy and side effects between venlafaxine and paroxetine in the treatment of depression in outpatients. Method:62 patients who met CCMD 2 R for depression were randomly assigned to 2 groups. One group was treated with venlafaxine and the other with paroxetine for six weeks. Hamilton rating scale (HAMD), clinical global impression scale (CGI),and treatment emergent symptom scale (TESS) were used to assess. Results: Total clinical effective rate was 80% for venlafaxine group and 87% for paroxetine group.There were no differences in clinical effects and adverse reactions between the two groups. Conclusion:The results indicate that venlafaxine is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of depression in outpatients.
Keywords:Depression  Venlafaxine  Paroxetine
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号