2006年许昌、平顶山和南阳市农村饮水安全工程抽样检查及验收报告

目的 了解许昌、平顶山和南阳市农村饮水安全工程的供水质量和运行管理现状,科学地评价饮水安全工程的社会效果.方法 按县、乡、村分层抽样,抽验县不少于任务县(市、区)数的50%(13/24),每县(市、区)抽验乡不少于任务乡的40%(42/102),每乡抽验村不少于任务村的30%(56/186);采用"听汇报、查档案、看工程、评等级"的方式进行.结果 95%(129/136)以上的工程在建设前后都有水质检验报告;检验报告90%(122/136)由县级疾病预防控制中心出具;检测的水样75%(102/136)由疾病预防控制部门或卫生监督部门采集;在工程竣工验收时,80%(109/136)的县(市、区)组织了联合验收小组;92%(125/136)的工程建成后水源地保护良好.结论 农村饮水安全工程建设、管理基本规范,供水基本合格,实现了预期目的,但各部门之间职责不够明确,沟通不够通畅,需今后加强协作,各负其责.

Acceptance test of dringking water improving project in Xuchang, Pingdingshan and Nanyang in 2006

Objective To investigate the water quality and running status of the dringking water improving project in Xuchang,Pingdingshan and Nanyang,thus to provide basis for scientifically evaluating social effects.Methods Stratified sampling was used in the levels of counties and townships and villages,with the number of checked counties greater than or eaquel to half of the projected counties(13/24),the checked townships more than 40 percent of the projected townships(42/102),the checked villages greater than or eaquel to 30% of the projected villages(56/186).We listened their statement,reviewed the documents,examined carefully the water projects before we made the appraisal.Results More than 95%(129/136)of the projects had water quality reports,among which 90%(122/136)were provided by county level centers for disease prevention and control,75% (102/136) of water samples were collected by centers for disease prevention and control,80%(109/136)ofcounties organized an acceptance check-up group,92%(125/136)projects well preserved water source.Conclusions The dringking water improvement projeets in countryside are basically normal in terms of construction and management,the water supplied is qualified,so the expected goal is achieved.However,duties of each department are not explicit and the communication is inadequate,so collaboration should be reinforced.