Long-term experience with AutoCapture-controlled epicardial pacing in children. |
| |
Authors: | Maren Tomaske Paul Harpes Rene Pretre Ali Dodge-Khatami Urs Bauersfeld |
| |
Affiliation: | Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland. maren.tomaske@kispi.uzh.ch |
| |
Abstract: | AIMS: To examine the feasibility and safety of AutoCapture (AC)-controlled pacing with epicardial leads in children, and study the effects on device longevity. METHODS: A total of 62 children were prospectively enrolled. Pre-discharge testing precluded AC function in six children. In 56 (90%) children, devices with AC-controlled pacing were followed up to 9years. Calculated battery life in AC-controlled pacing was compared with theoretical calculations, using a two-fold stimulation output of measured thresholds. RESULTS: In 53 of 56 children, no differences were observed for evoked response signals (13.3 vs. 11.5mV, P = 0.20) or lead polarization safety margins (5.5 vs. 4.1, P = 0.25) at 6-month and 4-year follow-up. A crossover to conventional pacing was required in 3 of 56 children. AC-controlled pacing prolonged the calculated battery life up to 15% for the identity and integrity devices with 0.95A h capacity, compared with theoretical conventional settings (P = 0.008). In patients with ventricular pacing thresholds >1.5V at 0.5ms, battery life was increased by 30% compared with theoretical conventional settings (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: AC-controlled pacing with epicardial leads is feasible and safe in children during long-term follow-up. An adequate lead polarization safety margin persists in most patients. Calculated battery life was prolonged up to 15% with AC-controlled pacing. Patients with high or fluctuating pacing thresholds benefit the most. |
| |
Keywords: | Pacemaker AutoCapture Safety Battery service life Epicardial pacing leads Pediatric |
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录! |
|