首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

颅内3种疾病伽玛刀与传统手术治疗的医疗效率和费用分析
引用本文:柯新华,欧东,曾凡,黄昊,于鸿飞,邹咏文,唐琳.颅内3种疾病伽玛刀与传统手术治疗的医疗效率和费用分析[J].中国医院管理,2001,21(3):15-16.
作者姓名:柯新华  欧东  曾凡  黄昊  于鸿飞  邹咏文  唐琳
作者单位:第三军医大学大坪医院野战外科研究所,重庆,400042
摘    要:通过对3种颅内疾病110例传统开颅手术和伽玛刀治疗的医疗效率指标和费用支出等方面比较。结果提示γ刀的治疗的平均住院日、平均术前住院日、平均术后住院日皆比开颅手术少,有利于提高医疗效率指标;两种方法治疗的人均医疗费相差不大;γ刀对颅内同时存在的两种疾病进行一次性治疗具有优势;开颅手术的后续治疗率明显高于γ刀治疗。

关 键 词:开颅手术  伽玛刀治疗  住院日  医疗费
修稿时间:2001年2月3日

Gamma Knife VS Craniotomy in Three Types of Intracranial Diseases
Ke Xinhua,Ou Dong,Zeng Fan,et al..Gamma Knife VS Craniotomy in Three Types of Intracranial Diseases[J].Chinese Hospital Management,2001,21(3):15-16.
Authors:Ke Xinhua  Ou Dong  Zeng Fan  
Institution:Ke Xinhua,Ou Dong,Zeng Fan,et al.Field Surgery Institute of Daping Hospital of Third Military Medical University,Chongqing,400042,PRC
Abstract:Comparative studies between Gamma knife and craniotomy treatments in three types of intracranial diseases in atotal of 110 cases showed: Gamma knife treatment needed shorter average hospital stay, average preoperative stay, and average postoperative stay, therefore with higher efficiency indicators than craniotomy treatment; no significant differences in per patient medical expenses between the two treatments; Gamma knife treatment has advantages in coexistent two intracranial diseases; follow - up treatment rate was significantly higher in craniotomy than in Gamma knife treatment.
Keywords:craniotomy  gamma knife  average hospital stay  medical expenses  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号