首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

氩氦刀冷冻消融和射频、微波热凝固治疗兔VX2肝癌的对比研究
引用本文:张克勤,张积仁,魏红梅.氩氦刀冷冻消融和射频、微波热凝固治疗兔VX2肝癌的对比研究[J].南方医科大学学报,2007,27(9):1431-1434.
作者姓名:张克勤  张积仁  魏红梅
作者单位:1. 南方医科大学珠江医院肿瘤中心,广东,广州,510282
2. 中国人民解放军88医院肿瘤中心,山东,泰安,271000
摘    要:目的 通过观察肿瘤残留和转移情况、治疗前后免疫功能变化以及兔的生存期并加以对比,探讨氩氦刀冷冻、射频消融(RFA)及微波凝同(MCT)治疗兔WX2肝癌的疗效.方法 将45只兔VX2肝癌模型随机分为五组,每组9只,即氩氦刀冷冻组(A组)、射频消融组(B组)、微波凝固组(C组)、手术切除组(D组)和对照组(E组).观察肿瘤转移情况(肝内转移、肺部转移、腹腔淋巴结转移和腹腔种植转移)和可溶性白介素-2受体(sIL-2R)变化及生存期等.结果 ①肝内肿瘤残留在A、B、C、D、E组分别为2、4、5、0、9只,差异有显著性(χ2=20.700,P=0.000);肝内转移分别为1、3、4、6、9只,差异有显著性(χ2=15.652,P=0.004);腹腔种植转移率分别为2、5、6、0、1只,差异有显著性(χ2=13.894,P=0.008);肺部及腹腔淋巴结转移各组均为9只,差异无显著性.②各组治疗前sIL-2R无明显差异,治疗后各组间差异有显著性(F=31.58,P=0.000);各组内治疗前后比较,A组、B组、C组和D组差异均无统计学意义,E组差异有显著性(t=10.119,P=0.000).③平均生存期:氩氦刀冷冻、RFA、MCT和手术切除组与对照组比较有显著性差异(F=73.084,P=0.000);氩氦刀冷冻和手术切除组显著高于RFA、MCT组;氩氦刀冷冻和手术切除组之间、RFA和MCT组之间无显著性差异.结论 在治疗兔VX2肝癌中,无论是在减少肿瘤残留和转移方面,还是在增强机体免疫力方面及延长实验兔生存期方面,氩氦刀冷冻治疗均优于RFA和MCT;而RFA和MCT疗效相当.

关 键 词:氩氦刀冷冻消融  射频消融  微波凝固  兔VX2肝癌模型
文章编号:1673-4254(2007)09-1431-04
修稿时间:2007-04-15

Therapeutic effects of cryoablation, radiorequency ablation, and microwave coagulation against VX2 liver cancer:a comparative study in rabbits
ZHANG Ke-qin,ZHANG Ji-ren,WEI Hong-mei.Therapeutic effects of cryoablation, radiorequency ablation, and microwave coagulation against VX2 liver cancer:a comparative study in rabbits[J].Journal of Southern Medical University,2007,27(9):1431-1434.
Authors:ZHANG Ke-qin  ZHANG Ji-ren  WEI Hong-mei
Institution:Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China.
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To Compare the therapeutic effects of cryocareTM cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation(RFA), and and microwave coagulation (MCT) in rabbits with VX(2) liver cancer. METHODS: Forty-five rabbits with VX(2) liver cancer were randomly and equally allocated into 5 groups to receive treatment with cryocare cryoablation (group A), radiofrequency ablation (group B), microwave coagulation (group C), surgical resection (group D) and control group (group E), respectively. The residual tumor tissues and metastasis (intrahepatic, lung, abdominal lymphoid node, and abdominal implantation) were observed after the treatments, with also detection of soluble interleukin-2 receptor ( sIL-2R) and recording of the survival time of the rabbits. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the occurrence of tumor residue (chi(2)=20.700, P=0.0000), intrahepatic metastasis (chi(2)=15.652, P=0.0004), and abdominal implantation tumor (chi(2)=13.894, P=0.0008) between the 5 groups, but not in lung and abdominal lymph node metastasis. sIL-2R levels differed significantly only after but not before the treatments (F=31.58, P=0.000) between groups A to D and group E (t=10.119, P=0.000). The treatments in groups A to D all resulted in prolonged survival of the rabbits as compared with the control (F=73.084, P=0.000), and cryocareTM cryoablation and surgical resection showed similarly better effect than RFA and MCT. CONCLUSION: Cryocare cryoablation can be more effective than RFA and MCT in reducing tumor residue and metastasis and prolonging the survival time of rabbits with VX(2) liver cancer, and RFA and MCT are comparable for their therapeutic effects.
Keywords:cryocare cryoablation  radiofrequency ablation  microwave coagulation therapy  rabbit VX2 liver cancer model
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号