首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

30日龄脆性X基因敲除小鼠的被动回避行为观察
引用本文:张伟雯,黄月玲,方敏华,孙卫文,李敏雄,戴丽军,陈盛强.30日龄脆性X基因敲除小鼠的被动回避行为观察[J].中华生物医学工程杂志,2012,18(5):384-387.
作者姓名:张伟雯  黄月玲  方敏华  孙卫文  李敏雄  戴丽军  陈盛强
作者单位:1. 510150,广州医学院第三附属医院检验科
2. 广州医学院实验动物中心
3. 广州医学院第二附属医院神经疾病研究所
基金项目:广州市医药卫生科技项目
摘    要:目的观察30日龄的脆性x基因(Fmrl)敲除小鼠(KO鼠)的被动回避行为。方法选取Fmrl基因敲除型(KO)纯合子(-/-)及其野生型(wT)纯合子(+/+)FVB近交系小鼠3013龄各15只,采用PCR鉴定实验动物KO鼠和wT鼠的基因型,进行2d的被动回避行为的避暗和跳台实验,比较2组小鼠电击次数和潜伏期时问。结果避暗实验中,第1天KO鼠的电击次数为(8.28+0.50)次,与wT鼠(7.10±0.46)次相比显著增多(P〈0.05);潜伏期时间虽增加但差异无统计学意义。第2天KO鼠的电击次数及潜伏期时间与wT鼠相比,差异均无统计学意义。KO和wT鼠第1天与第2天的潜伏期和电击次数相比,差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。跳台实验中,第1天KO鼠的潜伏期为(94.96±10.56)s,比wT鼠(135.73±12.17)s明显缩短(P〈0.05);而电击次数为(1.81±0.31)次,比wT鼠(O.67±0.13)次明显增多(P〈O.05)。第2天KO鼠的电击次数及潜伏期时间与wT鼠相比,差异也无统计学意义。第1天wT鼠的电击次数与第2天相比,差异无统计学意义,潜伏期则低于第2天(P〈O.05);而第1天KO鼠的潜伏期和电击次数与第2天相比,差异有统计学意义(均P〈O.05)。结论30日龄Fmrl基因敲除小鼠存在认知功能障碍。

关 键 词:脆性x综合征  小鼠  基因敲除  避暗实验  跳台实验

Passive avoidance in Fmr1-knockout mice at 30 days of age
ZHANG Wei-wen , HUANG Yue-ling , FANG Min-hua , SUN Wei-wen , LI Min-xiong , DAI Li-jun , CHEN Sheng-qiang.Passive avoidance in Fmr1-knockout mice at 30 days of age[J].Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering,2012,18(5):384-387.
Authors:ZHANG Wei-wen  HUANG Yue-ling  FANG Min-hua  SUN Wei-wen  LI Min-xiong  DAI Li-jun  CHEN Sheng-qiang
Institution:. *Department of Laboratory, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou 510150 , China
Abstract:Objective To investigate the passive avoidance behavior in Fmrl-knockout (KO) mice at 30 days of age. Methods Fmrl-KO mice(-/-, n=15) and wild-type FVB inbreeded (WT) mice (+/+, n= 15) at 30 days of age were allocated and subjected to genotyping by using polymerase chain reaction. Step- through and step-down tests were conducted for measurement of latency period and the number of electric shocks. Results During the step-through test, KO mice had higher incidence of electric shocks (8.28+0.50 vs 7.10~0.46, P〈0.05) than WT mice at day 1. There was an increased trend of latency period, but the between-group difference did not reach statistical significance. At day 2, there was no marked between-group difference in the latency period and number of electric shock. Additionally, the latency period and number of electric shock did differ considerably between day 1 and day 2(all P〈0.05). During the step-down test, KO mice yielded impressively shorter latency period (94.96+10.56)s vs (135.73+12.17)s, P〈O.05 ] yet higher incidence of electric shock (1.81+0.31 vs 0.67+0.13, P〈0.05) compared with WT mice. Between-group difference in the latency period and the number of electric shock did not reach statistical significance at day 2. There was no significant difference in the number of electric shock of WT mice between days 1 and 2. Thelatency period of WT mice was shorter than that at day 2(P〈0.05). However, the latency period and number of electric shocks of KO mice differed significantly between days 1 and 2 (all P〈0.05). Conclusion Fmrl- knockout mice at 30 days of age may have developed cognitive impairment.
Keywords:Fragile X syndrome  Mice  knockout  Step-through test  Step-down test
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号