首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同化疗方案(PCF vs OLF)治疗晚期胃癌的疗效及安全性评价
引用本文:蒋劲松,曹卫国,马韬,叶正宝,黎皓,徐昊平,夏红强,奚文崎,金冶宁. 不同化疗方案(PCF vs OLF)治疗晚期胃癌的疗效及安全性评价[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2006, 16(12): 1023-1027
作者姓名:蒋劲松  曹卫国  马韬  叶正宝  黎皓  徐昊平  夏红强  奚文崎  金冶宁
作者单位:上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院肿瘤放化疗科,上海,200025
摘    要:背景与目的:化学治疗可提高晚期胃癌患者的生活质量,延长生存期,但胃癌化疗方案众多,目前尚无“金标准”可循。本研究对61例晚期胃癌分别施以紫杉醇+顺铂(DDP)+氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)(PCF)方案或草酸铂+亚叶酸钙(LV)/5-FU(OLF)方案化疗,探讨不同方案的化疗疗效、不良反应及预后的影响因素。方法:61例晚期胃癌患者分两组,分别接受PCF方案(紫杉醇135mg/m^2,第1天;DDP15mg/m^2,第1~5天;5-FU500mg/m^2,第1~5天;每21d重复),或OLF方案(草酸铂130mg/m^2,第1天;LV200mg/m^2,第1~5天;5-FU750mg/m^2.第1~5天;每21d重复)3~6个周期,然后对所有患者进行随访至死亡为止。结果:PCF组有效率为51.6%(16/31),OLF组有效率为33.3%(10/30),两组近期疗效差异无显著性(P=0.209),PCF和OLF组的中位肿瘤进展时间(TTP)均为8个月(P=0.414),而前者的中位总生存期(OS)14个月,略优于后者(13个月),但差异无显著性(P=0.300);PCF组的白细胞减少发生率达80%(22/31),显著高于OLF组(43.3%,P=0.033),而OLF组的外周神经炎发生率显著高于PCF组(P〈0.001)。单因素生存分析提示女性、临床分期Ⅳ期、近期疗效较差者的预后不佳,而多因素生存分析显示,近期疗效是决定晚期胃癌TTP和OS的唯一独立预后因素。结论:PCF和OLF两种方案治疗晚期胃癌,近、远期疗效相近而耐受性较好,而化疗的近期疗效是晚期胃癌患者TTP和OS的独立预后因素。

关 键 词:晚期胃癌  化学治疗  紫杉醇  奥沙利铂
文章编号:1007-3639(2006)12-1023-05
收稿时间:2006-06-12
修稿时间:2006-07-18

The evaluation of efficacy and safety of different combined chemotherapy regimen (PLF vs. OLF) for patients with late-stage gastric carcinoma
JIANG Jin-song,CAO Wei-guo,MA Tao,YE Zheng-bao,LI Hao,XU Hao-ping,XIA Hong-qiang,XI Wen-qi,JIN Ye-ning. The evaluation of efficacy and safety of different combined chemotherapy regimen (PLF vs. OLF) for patients with late-stage gastric carcinoma[J]. China Oncology, 2006, 16(12): 1023-1027
Authors:JIANG Jin-song  CAO Wei-guo  MA Tao  YE Zheng-bao  LI Hao  XU Hao-ping  XIA Hong-qiang  XI Wen-qi  JIN Ye-ning
Abstract:Background and purpose:Chemotherapy could improve quality of life and prolong the survival of patients with late-stage gastric carcinoma.No "golden standard" regimen is to set up nowadays,although there are numerous chemotherapy regimens available.Sixty-one patients with late-stage gastric cancer received either paclitaxel,cisplatin and fluorouracil(PCF) chemotherapy,or oxaliplatin and LV/fluorouracil(OLF) chemotherapy in our hospital.Therefore,the efficacy,adverse reaction,and prognostic factors of two regimens were explored.Methods:Sixty-one patients were divided into two groups.PCF group received 3 to 6 cycles of PCF regimen(paclitaxel 135 mg/m~(2) d 1,cisplatin 15mg/m~(2) d 1-5,fluorouracil 500 mg/m~(2) d 1-5,once every 21 days),and OLF group received regimen(oxaliplatin 130 mg/m~(2) d 1,LV 200 mg/m~(2) d 1-5,fluorouracil 750 mg/m~(2) d 1-5,once every 21 days),respectively.The follow-up was carried on until all of the patient were deceased.Results:The response rate were 51.6%(16/31) in PCF group and 33.3%(10/30) in OLF group,respectively.There was no significant difference between immediate responses of two groups(P=0.209).The median time for tumor to progression(TTP) in PCF group and OLF group were both 8 months(P=0.414),and the overall survival(OS) of the PCF group was 14 months,which was slightly longer than the latter(13 months,P=0.300).The incidence rate of leukocytopenia in PCF group was 80%(22/31),compared to that in OLF group(43.3%,P=0.033),while the incidence rate of peripheral neuritis of OLF group is statistically higher than that of PCF group(P<0.001).Univariate survival analysis showed that female,the patients with IV stage or poor short-term response were negative prognostic factors.Multivariate survival analysis showed that the shortterm effect was the only independent prognostic factor for TTP and OS of the patients with late-stage gastric carcinoma.Conclusions:PCF and OLF regimens have similar short-and long-term effect and both were well tolerated for the treatment of late-stage gastric carcinoma.And the short-term effect of chemotherapy was the independent prognostic factor for TTP and OS in the patients with late-stage gastric carcinoma.
Keywords:late-stage gastric carcinoma   chemotherapy   paclitaxel   oxaliplatin
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号