首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

国产替罗非班对急诊冠脉介入治疗患者的远期预后作用
引用本文:宋丹,余志华,熊辉,鄢华,刘华云,彭剑,陈国洪,汪敏,苏唏.国产替罗非班对急诊冠脉介入治疗患者的远期预后作用[J].心血管康复医学杂志,2008,17(4):393-395.
作者姓名:宋丹  余志华  熊辉  鄢华  刘华云  彭剑  陈国洪  汪敏  苏唏
作者单位:武汉亚洲心脏病医院心内科,湖北,武汉,430022
摘    要:目的:探讨急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中使用国产替罗非班(欣维宁)对患者的远期无事件生存率及心功能的影响。方法:回顾性分析我院2003年3月至2006年3月急诊PCI治疗患者117例,按是否使用国产替罗非班分为治疗组(n=36)和对照组(n-81),随访1年,观察并比较两组的全因死亡率、心肌梗塞率、靶血管重建率及左室射血分数(LVEF)、左室舒张末期容积指数(LVEDVI)、左室收缩末期容积指数(LVESVI)。结果:两组一般情况、基础临床情况和造影、介入资料均无显著差异(P〉0.05),且两组术后即刻TIMIⅢ级血流相似(94.44%:92.59%P〉0.05)。术后随访1月时,两组均无主要心血管事件发生。两组LVEF均较术前有明显改善,但治疗组改善更明显(47.89%:41.75%P〈0.05);且治疗组LVEDVI(73.49ml/m^2)和LVESVI(42.86ml/m^2)均较对照组(82.77ml/m^2、53.52ml/m^2)明显下降(P均〈0.05)。随访1年,治疗组有3例发生主要心血管事件,对照组有6例,无事件生存率两组间无显著差异(8.33%:7.41%P〉0.05)。两组心功能较术后1月有明显改善,但两组心功能相比未见显著差异。结论:急诊PCI术中使用国产替罗非班对远期无事件生存率无影响,但能明显改善患者PCI术后1月的心功能,而1年后这种获益不复存在。

关 键 词:替罗非班  血管成形术  经腔  经皮冠状动脉  死亡率

Prognosis effect of tirofiban made in China in patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention
SONG dan,YU Zhi-hua,XIONG Hui,YAN Hua,LIU Hua-yun,PENG Jian,CHEN Guo-hong,WANG Min,SU Xi.Prognosis effect of tirofiban made in China in patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine,2008,17(4):393-395.
Authors:SONG dan  YU Zhi-hua  XIONG Hui  YAN Hua  LIU Hua-yun  PENG Jian  CHEN Guo-hong  WANG Min  SU Xi
Institution:(Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China)
Abstract:Objective; To investigate the effect of tirofiban made in China on event-free survival and cardiac function recovery in patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: A total of 117 patients who underwent primary PCI between March 2003 to March 2006 were divided into two groups: the tirofiban treatment group (n= 36) and the control group (n= 81). The occurrence of the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization and left ventricular ejaculation fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) were assessed at 1 year after PCI. Results: There was no significant difference between two groups in basic clinical or angiographic characteristics before PCI (P 〉0.05). The two groups had no difference in percentage of TIMI Ⅲ flow achieved in infarction relate artery (IRAs) after PCI (94.44% : 92.59% P〉0. 05). No MACE in both groups after 1 month follow-up. Furthermore heart function in two groups had improved. But higher LVEF (47.89% : 41.75% P〈0.05) and fewer LVEDVI (73. 49ml/m^2 : 82.77 ml/m^2 P〈0.05), LVSDVI (42.86 ml/m^2: 53.52 ml/m^2 P〈0.05) were achieved in the tirofiban treatment group. At 1 year after PCI, there was no significant difference between two groups in occurrence of MACE (8.33%: 7.41% P〉0.05) and cardiac function improvement. But heart function was dramatically improvement compared with 1-month after PCI. Conclusion: Application of tirofiban made in China during primary PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction improved heart function at 1 month after PCI, but this benefit did not continue to 1 year. Nevertheless, the rate of event-free survival was no significant difference between two groups during 1-year follow-up.
Keywords:Tirofiban  Percutaneous coronary intervention  Mortality
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号