首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

米氮平与西酞普兰治疗抑郁症临床对照研究
引用本文:陈绪焕,夏学斌,王丽华. 米氮平与西酞普兰治疗抑郁症临床对照研究[J]. 中国民康医学, 2008, 20(21): 2498-2499
作者姓名:陈绪焕  夏学斌  王丽华
作者单位:广东省珠海市红旗医院精神科,广东,珠海,519095
摘    要:目的:评估米氮平与西酞普兰治疗抑郁症的疗效和不良反应。方法:将符合CCMD-3诊断标准的52例抑郁症住院和门诊患者,随机分为两组,各26例,分别予米氮平和西酞普兰治疗,疗程6周。用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、临床疗效总评量表的病情严重程度(CGI-S1)和副反应量表(TESS)评定疗效和不良反应。结果:米氮平与西酞普兰对抑郁症疗效接近,但前者起效更快,不良反应少于后者。结论:米氮平是一种安全、有效的新一代抗抑郁药,可作为治疗抑郁症的第一线药物使用。

关 键 词:米氮平  西酞普兰  抑郁症  临床对照

A control study on mirtazapine and citaloparm in the treatment of depression
CHEN Xu-huan,XIA Xue-bin,WANG Li-hua. A control study on mirtazapine and citaloparm in the treatment of depression[J]. medical journal of chinese peoples health, 2008, 20(21): 2498-2499
Authors:CHEN Xu-huan  XIA Xue-bin  WANG Li-hua
Abstract:Objective:To compare efficacy and side effects between mirtazapine and citaloparm in the treatment of depression.Methods:48 inpatients and outpatients with a diagnosis of depression according to CCMD-3 were involved in this study,they were randomly assigned to mirtazapine group(n = 26) and citaloparm group(n = 26) for 6 weeks.Effects and side reactions were evaluated with HAMD,HAMA,CGI-SI and TESS before and after the treatment.Results: Findings indicated that efficacy of mirtazapine was similar to than of citaloparm,however mirtazapine took effect more quickly and its side effects were less than citaloparm.Conclusions: Mirtazapine is an effective and safe antidepressant.It is suggested that mirtazapine could be used as a first-line antidepressant in the treatment of depression.
Keywords:Mirtazapine  Citaloparm  Depression  Control study
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号