2000-2006年《中国地方病学杂志》高被引论文分析

目的 分析<中国地方病学杂志>高被引论文的内在规律,以期进一步明确杂志的组稿方向,吸引并挖掘优质稿源,从而提高期刊的核心竞争力.方法 在中国知网中检索2000-2006年<中国地方病学杂志>发表的被引频次≥20次的论文(检索日期截至2010年12月27日),对高被引论文的发表时间、发表栏目、第一作者、作者单位及地区分布进行统计分析.结果 共检索出高被引论文68篇,被引频次为20～94,平均31.09次.高被引论文发表时间以2000年最多,占25.0%(17/68);2001年次之,占20.6%(14/68);2006年最少,占2.9%(2/68).实验研究类论文在高被引论文中所占比例最高,为30.9%(21/68);其次是现场调查类论文,占23.5%(16/68);述评、综述类论文分别占10.3%(7/68)和8.8%(6/68);简报、病例报告、会议纪要等栏目没有高被引论文;述评、专家论坛、学术争鸣栏目的 高被引论文数占该栏目论文总数的比例较高(7/19、3/11、3/7).高被引论文来自13个省(直辖市),有2篇及以上高被引论文的作者有10位,有2篇及以上高被引论文的单位有8家.结论 实验研究、现场调查、述评、专家论坛和学术争鸣类论文对杂志总被引频次贡献较大,应该保证并提高其刊出比例.需进一步巩固和扩大优秀作者队伍,加大组织重点选题和向有影响力的专家的约稿力度.

Abstract：

Objective To analysis the inherent quality of highly cited papers published in Chinese Journal of Endemiology, so as to identify the direction of invitation for contributions, find high quality articles, and to improve the journal's core competitiveness. Methods Scientific papers published in Chinese Journal of Endemiology from 2000 to 2006, with citation rate equal to or higher than 20 times were retrieved in China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) by December 27, 2010. These articles were statistically analyzed according to publication year, section type, author, and geographical distribution of units. Results A total of 68 highly cited papers were obtained. The citation frequency of the highly cited papers ranged from 20 to 94, with an average of 31.09 times. The highly cited papers were published in 2000 at most, accounting for 25.0%(17/68); followed by 2001,accounting for 20.6% (14/68); at least in 2006, accounting for 2.9% (2/68). Of the highly cited papers, experimental study articles was in the highest proportion of 30.9%(21/68); followed by field epidemiological investigation articles,accounting for 23.5%(16/68); editorial, review articles accounting for 10.3%(7/68) and 8.8%(6/68), respectively;short reports, case reports, meeting records etc were not highly cited papers. The number of highly cited papers in editorial, expert forums, academic contend accounted for higher proportion of total number in corresponding section types(7/19, 3/11, 3/7). Highly cited papers came from 13 provinces(municipalities), there were 10 authors contributed two or more highly cited papers, and 8 units contributed two or more highly cited papers. Conclusions Adequate space should be given to experimental research, field epidemiological investigation, editorial, expert forums andacademic contend articles due to their high rate of citation. More attention should be paid to further consolidate and expand excellent authors group, and to intensify the invitation for key issues from influential experts.

Analysis of highly cited papers published in Chinese Journal of Endemiology during 2000-2006

Objective To analysis the inherent quality of highly cited papers published in Chinese Journal of Endemiology, so as to identify the direction of invitation for contributions, find high quality articles, and to improve the journal's core competitiveness. Methods Scientific papers published in Chinese Journal of Endemiology from 2000 to 2006, with citation rate equal to or higher than 20 times were retrieved in China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) by December 27, 2010. These articles were statistically analyzed according to publication year, section type, author, and geographical distribution of units. Results A total of 68 highly cited papers were obtained. The citation frequency of the highly cited papers ranged from 20 to 94, with an average of 31.09 times. The highly cited papers were published in 2000 at most, accounting for 25.0%(17/68); followed by 2001,accounting for 20.6% (14/68); at least in 2006, accounting for 2.9% (2/68). Of the highly cited papers, experimental study articles was in the highest proportion of 30.9%(21/68); followed by field epidemiological investigation articles,accounting for 23.5%(16/68); editorial, review articles accounting for 10.3%(7/68) and 8.8%(6/68), respectively;short reports, case reports, meeting records etc were not highly cited papers. The number of highly cited papers in editorial, expert forums, academic contend accounted for higher proportion of total number in corresponding section types(7/19, 3/11, 3/7). Highly cited papers came from 13 provinces(municipalities), there were 10 authors contributed two or more highly cited papers, and 8 units contributed two or more highly cited papers. Conclusions Adequate space should be given to experimental research, field epidemiological investigation, editorial, expert forums andacademic contend articles due to their high rate of citation. More attention should be paid to further consolidate and expand excellent authors group, and to intensify the invitation for key issues from influential experts.