首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

福建省消除疟疾地区重新流行风险指标体系的构建
引用本文:王晓欢,张山鹰. 福建省消除疟疾地区重新流行风险指标体系的构建[J]. 中国人兽共患病杂志, 2015, 31(11): 1081-1085. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2015.11.020
作者姓名:王晓欢  张山鹰
作者单位:1.福建医科大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学专业,福州 350108;2.福建省疾病预防控制中心,福州 350001
摘    要:目的在福建省连续十年没有当地感染疟疾的背景下,建立消除疟疾地区重新流行风险指标体系并确定各指标权重。方法遵循专家德尔菲法和层次分析法,选择恰当符合我省疟疾防控实际的指标建立评价指标体系,并确定各指标的权重。结果专家咨询的积极系数为100%,权威系数为0.842,Kendall 协调系数为0.493,χ2=29.5740,P<0.001。构建福建省消除疟疾地区重新流行风险指标评估体系,包括5个一级指标,11个二级指标,指标体系的内在信度Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.7725>0.7,基本符合要求。结构效度分析,KMO值为0.527,Bartlett’s检验的χ2=80.807,P=0.013<0.05,适合作因子分析。评价指标的公因子方差均大于0.74,5个主成分的累积贡献率为85.743%。根据专家综合评分应用层次分析法确定各级指标权重,其中一级指标包括传染源、传疟媒介、易感人群、自然因素和社会因素,权重分别为0.263 8,0.510 0,0.129 6,0.032 9,0.063 6; λmax=5.237 2,CI=0.059 3,CR=0.052 9。各评价指标的组合权重中,媒介按蚊种类的权重最高,为0.340 2,各县输入型病例数权重第2,为0.230 8,符合我省目前疟疾消除的防控现状。结论选择恰当符合福建省实际的指标建立了消除疟疾地区重新流行指标体系,为今后科学、客观、全面的对疟疾重新流行的风险评价提供基础。

关 键 词:疟疾  消除  Delphi法  层次分析法  指标体系  福建省  
收稿时间:2015-06-04

Establishment of re-epidemic risk index system of the elimination of malaria in Fujian Province
WANG Xiao-huan,ZHANG Shan-ying. Establishment of re-epidemic risk index system of the elimination of malaria in Fujian Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Zoonoses, 2015, 31(11): 1081-1085. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2015.11.020
Authors:WANG Xiao-huan  ZHANG Shan-ying
Affiliation:1.Department of Epidemiology and Statistics,College of Public Health,Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou 350108,China; 2.Fujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Fuzhou 350001,China
Abstract:Under the background of the elimination of malaria basically in Fujian Province, we established the re-epidemic risk index system in the elimination of malaria areas,and aimed to obtain the weights of each index. The indexes which meet the reality of prevention in Fujian Province were filtered by the method of literature analysis and Delphi method.Analytical hierarchy process was used to calculate the weights at three levels. The positive coefficient of experts was 100%, the expert authority coefficient was 0.842, and the Kendall coordination coefficient was 0.493, χ2=29.574 0, P<0.001. The index system consisted of 5 first-level indexes and 11 second-level indexes.Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of index system was 0.772 5>0.7, which meet the requirements basically.Through the construction validity analysis,KMO value was 0.527, Bartlett’s test χ2=80.807, P=0.013<0.05,the variances of all evaluation indexs were more than 0.74, and the cumulative proportion of the 5 principal components was 85.743%. According to the comprehensive score of experts and application of AHP to determine weights of all indexs, first-level indexes included the source of infection, malaria vector, the susceptible population, natural factors and social factors,their weights was 0.263 8,0.510 0,0.129 6,0.032 9 and 0.063 6,λmax was 5.237 2,the consistency index was 0.059 3, random consistency ratio was 0.0529.the weight of Anopheles species index is 0.3402, which was the highest one and weight of imported cases is the second one and the value was, 0.230 8, which is in line with the current situation at present malaria elimination in our province. The establishment of the re-epidemic risk index system in the elimination of malaria areas will lay the foundation for the assessment of malaria risk scientifically, objectively and comprehensively.
Keywords:malaria  elimination  Delphi method  analytical hierarchy process  index system  Fujian Province  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国人兽共患病杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国人兽共患病杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号