|
|||||
|
|
Outcomes of bail-out stenting for suboptimal balloon angioplasty during primary intervention in acute myocardial infarction (The CADILLAC trial) |
|
| Authors: | Ashby Dale T,Aymong Eve A,Grines Cindy L,Cox David A,Garcia Eulogio,Mehran Roxana,Tcheng James E,Griffin John J,Guagliumi Giulio,Stuckey Thomas,Carroll John D,Turco Mark,Lansky Alexandra J,Stone Gregg W CADILLAC trial |
| Affiliation: | a Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute, New York City, New York, USA b William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA c Mid Carolina Cardiology, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA d Hospital Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain e Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA f Virginia Beach General Hospital, Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA g Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy h Moses Cone Memorial Hospital, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA i University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA j Washington Adventist Hospital, Tacoma Park, Maryland, USA |
| Abstract: | The results of bail-out stenting after unsuccessful primary balloon angioplasty compared with routine stenting or successful balloon angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction are unknown. In the CADILLAC trial, 168 of 1,044 patients (16.1%) randomized to balloon angioplasty crossed over to stenting after unsuccessful dilatation. Event-free survival was similar after bail-out and routine stenting, and was greater than after successful balloon angioplasty. |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录！ | |