连续腰麻用于肾移植手术的临床观察

目的 通过比较在肾移植手术中应用腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉和连续腰麻的临床效果,探讨连续腰麻用于此类手术的可行性和安全性.方法 选择拟行肾移植手术患者60例,随机分为腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉组(A组)和连续腰麻组(B组),每组30例.A组经腰麻针注入0.75%罗哌卡因2 mL后,向头侧置入硬膜外导管,术中根据麻醉需求经硬膜外导管追加0.75%罗哌卡因10 mL;B组,经Spinocath导管于蛛网膜下腔注入0.75%罗哌卡因2 mL,术中根据麻醉需求经Spinocath导管追加0.75%罗哌卡因1 mL.观察2组麻醉效果及患者术中生命体征的变化.结果 A、B组均顺利完成手术;2组术中循环功能指标与麻醉前基础值相比均无显著性差异;术后2组均未发现麻醉相关并发症;B组在麻醉平面控制及麻醉维持方面优于A组.结论 在肾移植手术中,应用Spinocath导管行连续腰麻是安全、可行的.

Continuous spinal anesthesia for renal homotransplantation

Objective To discuss the feasibility and safety of continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) in renal transplantation through comparing the effects of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and CSA renal transplantation. Methods Sixty patients undertaking renal transplantation were divided into two groups randomly. Group A, 30 patients, undertaking operation with CSEA; Group B, 30 patients, undertaking operation with CSA. The patients in group A were injected 2 mL 0.75% ropivacaine, then epidural catheter was inserted, 0. 75% ropivacaine 10 mL was administered when needed. The patients in group B were injected 2 mL 0.75% ropivacaine into spinal through Spinocath catheter, and 0.75% ropivacaine 1ml was administered through Spinocath catheter when needed. We observed the effects of the two anesthesia methods and the changes of the patients' vital signs. Results The patients in group A and B all completed the operation smoothly; there were no significant differences in the circulatory function before and during operation; there were no complications related to anesthesia in all the patients; group B was superior to group A in the aspects of the control and maintaining of anesthesia. Conclusion Continuous spinal anesthesia applied to renal transplantation is safe and feasible.