首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

高血压性脑出血碎吸与开颅治疗比较
引用本文:苏贺先,刘长文.高血压性脑出血碎吸与开颅治疗比较[J].蚌埠医学院学报,1999,24(1):21-22.
作者姓名:苏贺先  刘长文
作者单位:[1]蚌埠医学院附属医院神经外科 [2]蚌埠医学院附属医院重症监护中心
摘    要:目的;对高血压性脑出血采用钻颅碎吸与开两种治疗方法的近期与远期疗效比较。方法:97例随机分组,采用CT定位,颅内碎吸与传统开颅清除血肿。术后随访3-12个月。结果;碎吸组与开颅组在降低病死率和提高远期生存质量方面,差异均无显著性。结论:首选碎吸治疗高血压性脑出血,不一定要行开颅术。

关 键 词:脑出血  高血压  并发症  外科手术

Intracranial breaking and drainaging of hematoma or removal through craniotomy in hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage
Su Hexian,Lou Feiyun,Yu Zhenguo,Zhang Shaojun,Yang Baichun,Liu Changwen.Intracranial breaking and drainaging of hematoma or removal through craniotomy in hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage[J].Journal of Bengbu Medical College,1999,24(1):21-22.
Authors:Su Hexian  Lou Feiyun  Yu Zhenguo  Zhang Shaojun  Yang Baichun  Liu Changwen
Abstract:Objective:To compare the immediate and nemote effects of intracranial breaking and drainaging hematoma with that of surgical removal through craniotomy in hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.Methods:97 cases were divided randomly into two groups:one group treated with intracranial breaking and drainaging of hematomas and another group by traditional craniotomy with the localization by CT.All patients were followed up from 3 to 12 months after surgical manipulation.Results:The difference in decreasing of fatality rate and improving in nemote effect in survival quality between the two groups was not significant( P >0.05).Conclusions:Intracranial breaking and drainaging of hematoma should be first of choice in treating the hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.
Keywords:cerebral hemorrhage  hypertention  intracranial breaking and drainaging of hematomas  craniotomy
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号