首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像优化方案
引用本文:盖青竹,张光辉,张国伟,刘旭林. 64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像优化方案[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2010, 4(10): 83-87. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2010.10.023
作者姓名:盖青竹  张光辉  张国伟  刘旭林
作者单位:烟台市烟台山医院CT室,山东省,264001
摘    要:目的 研究64层CT冠状动脉CTA成像时合理的对比剂注射时间及自动跟踪结合手动触发扫描技术在CTA中的应用价值.方法 (1)对临床拟诊冠心病的338例患者进行CTA检查,其中自动跟踪智能触发组256例,根据触发时间不同分为三组:<15 s组、15~19 s组及>19 s组,探讨触发时间与对比剂注射时间的相关性.自动跟踪手动触发组82例与自动跟踪智能触发15~19 s组106例(最佳组)对照,评价智能触发组与手动触发组对冠状动脉成像质量的影响.(2)对比剂采用优维显(370 mg I/ml),按1 ml/kg体重给药,剂量多在55~85 ml,适当调节剂量与速率保证对比剂持续注射时间为17 s,注射速率按剂量/17计算.(3)自动跟踪智能扫描组阈值设为120 HU;自动跟踪结合手动触发组阈值设为500 HU.结果 (1)256例受检者叶84%降主动脉起始部对比剂达到阈值的时间在13~18 s,平均为15.8 s,加上3.3 s的屏气时间,再减去2 s的盐水排空时间,对比剂的注射时间为17 s最合理,智能触发组中触发时间为15~19 s的图像质量明显优于其他两组,组间差异有统计学意义(P值分别为0.037和0.040).(2)手动触发能克服智能触发启动过早或过晚的问题,图像质量明显优于智能触发组,两组问差异有统计学意义(P=0.036).结论 (1)CTA检查时最佳的对比剂持续注射时间为17 s.(2)自动跟踪结合手动触发的图像质量明显优于自动触发者,应普及推广使用.

关 键 词:冠心病  冠状血管造影术  体层摄影术,螺旋计算机  手动触发

Research in optimizing program in 64-MDCT coronary artery angiography
GAI Qing-zhu,ZHANG Guang-hui,ZHANG Guo-wei,LIU Xu-lin. Research in optimizing program in 64-MDCT coronary artery angiography[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Version), 2010, 4(10): 83-87. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2010.10.023
Authors:GAI Qing-zhu  ZHANG Guang-hui  ZHANG Guo-wei  LIU Xu-lin
Affiliation:.Department of Radiology,Yantaishan Hospital,Yantai 264001,China
Abstract:Objective (1)To study the reasonable 64-MDCT coronary artery angiography injection time.(2)To study the application value of 64-MDCT coronary artery angiography automatic tracking combined with manual triggering.Methods (1)256 cases of all 338 patients suspected coronary heart disease undertook automatic tracking intelligence triggering,and were divided into 3 groups according to different triggering time(15 s,15-19 s,19 s),to study the correlation between triggering time and constrast injection time.Eighty-two cases undertook automatic tracking manual triggering,compared with 106 cases of automatic tracking intelligence triggering group(15-19 s),and were evaluated the angiography quality of these 2 groups.(2)Ultravist(370 mg I/ml)was used by 1 ml/kg,and the dose was 55-85 ml.Adjust constrast dose and rate to gurantee the constrast continuous injection time is 17 s,and the injection rate was equal to dose number/17.(3)Intelligence triggering group threshold value was set for 120 HU,and manual triggering group threshold value was set for 500 HU.Results (1)Constrast reaching threshold value time was 13-18 s (average,15.8 s) at the beginning part of 84% descending aorta among 256 cases,and plus 3.3 s of holding breath time and minus 2 s saline injection,so the most reasonable constrast continuous injection time was 17 s.Automatic tracking intelligence triggering group(15-19 s) had the best angiography quality compared with 15 s and 19 s groups (P=0.037,0.040).(2)Auto tracking combined with manual triggering group can avoid scanning too early or too late,and had better angiography quality,compared with intelligence triggering group(P=0.036).Conclusions (1)The most reasonable 64-MDCT coronary artery angiography injection time was 17 s.(2)Manual triggering had better angiography quality,compared with intelligence triggering.
Keywords:Coronary disease  Coronary angiography  Tomography  spiral computed  Manual triggering
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号