首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

3种治疗方案治疗呼吸道细菌感染的成本-效果分析
引用本文:葛兰.3种治疗方案治疗呼吸道细菌感染的成本-效果分析[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2006,6(4):235-236.
作者姓名:葛兰
作者单位:安徽蚌埠医学院第二附属医院药剂科,蚌埠市,233040
摘    要:目的:评价3种治疗方案治疗呼吸道细菌感染的成本-效果。方法:对120例呼吸道细菌感染患者分别应用A(头孢曲松钠)、B(头孢曲松钠 左氧氟沙星)、C(阿奇霉素)3种方案进行治疗,观察疗效,并应用药物经济学成本-效果分析法进行评价。结果:A、B、C组成本分别为191.20元、210.72元、265.60元;有效率分别为80.00%、93.33%、86.67%;成本-效果比分别为2.39、2.26、、3.06;B、C组相对于A组的增量成本-效果比分别为1.46、11.15。结论:B组是更经济的选择。

关 键 词:呼吸道细菌感染  治疗方案  成本-效果分析
文章编号:1672-2124(2006)04-0235-02
修稿时间:2006年5月22日

Cost - effectiveness Analysis of 3 Therapeutic Schemes for Respiratory Infection
GE Lan.Cost - effectiveness Analysis of 3 Therapeutic Schemes for Respiratory Infection[J].Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-Use in Hospital of China,2006,6(4):235-236.
Authors:GE Lan
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of three therapeutic schemes for respiratory infection.METHODS: A total of 120 cases with respiratory infections were assigned to receive ceftriaxone sodium(scheme A),ceftriaxone sodium plus levofloxacin(scheme B) and azithromycin(scheme C),respectively.The therapeutic effects of the three schemes were monitored and evaluated using pharmacoecomonic cost-effectiveness analysis.RESULTS: The costs of scheme A,B and C were 191.20 yuan,210.72 yuan and 265.60 yuan,respectively;the effective rates of the three were 80.00%,93.33% and 86.67%,respectively;the cost-effectiveness ratios were 2.39,2.26 and 3.06,respectively;the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the three schemes were 25.63 yuan,22.92 yuan and 24.47 yuan, respectively;the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of scheme B and C were 1.46 and 11.15,respectively as against scheme A.CONCLUSION: Scheme B is a more economical choice among the three for respiratory infection.
Keywords:respiratory infection  therapeutic schemes  cost-effectiveness analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号