不同学制本科护理毕业生临床能力的差异性比较

目的比较不同学制本科护生的临床能力之间的差异，探讨相关因素，为本科护理教育提供有力依据。方法采用本科护生临床能力评价表对普通本科、高职本科及专升本共75名护生和44名教师进行调查。结果75名护生的临床能力均在及格或以上水平。三组护生临床处置、护理科研和临床教学能力的他评结果，差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）；临床能力总评和7项临床能力自评结果差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论本科护生的临床能力均达到了本科护理教育的目标，但三种类型的本科护生之间临床能力水平存在差异。在临床护理教学中，对于不同类型的护生，带教老师应按照“因材施教”的原则，进行个体化教学。

Comparison on the differences of clinical competence of three types of under-graduate nursing students

Objective To compare the differences of clinical competence of three types under-graduate nursing students and investigate related factors so that some powerful evidence could be provided to consummate Chinese undergraduate nursing education. Methods undergraduate nursing students' clinical competence assessment scale was used to interview 75 students and 44 teachers. Results 75 students were on or above valid level. There were statistically significant differences in teachers' perceptions of three types of students' clinical nursing practice, nursing research and clinical teaching competences, and even in students' perceptions of their 7 clinical competences. Conclusions All the nursing students' clinical competence got to the undergraduate educational goals. But three types of students' competence levels were different. So clinical teachers should train different students with different educational mode.