Development and psychometric validation of a novel measure of sensory expectancies associated with E-cigarette use |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Psychology, Oberlin College, 120 W. Lorain St., Oberlin, OH 44074, USA;2. Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, 34 Park St. New Haven, CT 06519, USA;3. Institute for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention Research, University of Southern California, 2001 N Soto Street, 3rd Floor, MC 9239, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA;4. Penn State Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Penn State University, College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033, USA;5. Health Sector, Westat, 1450 Research Boulevard, TC3030, Rockville, MD 20850, USA;6. Tobacco Control Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA;7. Division of Adolescent Medicine, Stanford Medicine, 770 Welch Rd Suite 100, Stanford, CA 94304, USA;8. Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, 550 King Ave., Columbus, OH 43201, USA;9. School of Public Health, Georgia State University, 878 Urban Life Building, 140 Decatur, St. Atlanta, GA 30303, USA;1. Penn State University College of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Hershey, PA 17033, United States;2. Penn State University College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, United States;1. Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, United States of America;2. Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, United States of America;1. School of Public Health, Georgia State University, PO Box 3995, Atlanta, GA 30302-3995, USA;2. Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, 1100 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 400, Seattle, WA 98109, USA;3. The Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, 900 G St. NW, Floor Four, Washington, DC, 20001, USA;4. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, USA;5. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto Street, Los Angeles, CA, USA;6. Department of Otolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, ACT Center for Tobacco Treatment, Education and Research, 350 West Woodrow Wilson Drive, JMM Suite 611, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, 39213, USA;7. Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Nicotine Addiction, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;8. Department of Kinesiology & Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, 2109 San Jacinto Blvd Mail Stop D3700, Austin, TX 78712, USA;1. Department of Psychology, University of Houston, 3695 Cullen Blvd., Room 126, Houston, TX 77204, USA;2. Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA;3. Health Institute, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA |
| |
Abstract: | IntroductionE-cigarette dependence measures largely focus on e-cigarette use (“vaping”) that is linked to nicotine use, and measures assessing sensory aspects of vaping that may influence use (e.g., taste) are limited in scope. Thus, we developed the novel Sensory E-cigarette Expectancies Scale (SEES).MethodsIn Summer 2017, 610 adult e-cigarette users (48.7% male, 84.9% White, 37.41[±12.15] years old) completed an online survey that included 23 SEES items. Psychometric analyses included evaluating latent structure, internal consistency, measurement invariance, mean differences, and test-criterion relationships.ResultsFactor analyses supported a 9-item, 3-subscale structure (taste/smell, pleasure/satisfaction, vapor cloud production). Subscales evidenced internal consistency and scalar invariance by sex, race, smoking status (current/not), vaping status (daily/not), e-liquid nicotine content (yes/no), and device type (cig-a-likes/vape-pens/Advanced Personal Vaporizers [APVs]/Mods). Women and daily e-cigarette users reported stronger SEEs for taste/smell and pleasure than their counterparts. Non-white participants reported stronger SEEs for cloud production than White participants. Cig-a-like users reported the weakest SEEs for taste/smell and weaker SEEs linked to cloud production than APV/mod users. SEES scores evidenced convergence with nicotine dependence (mean r = .36). Finally, SEES scores predicted vaping frequency and habitual vaping concurrently and incrementally beyond nicotine dependence.ConclusionsThe SEES evidenced good psychometric properties, suggesting that the measure can be used to assess sensory vaping expectancies in adults. Importantly, SEES scores indicated that sensory expectancies are related, yet distinct, from nicotine dependence. Future research should evaluate how SEEs relate to product characteristic preferences and patterns of vaping including the development and maintenance of addiction. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|