Evaluation of Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive-Unit-Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat Analysis and Spoligotyping for Genotyping of Mycobacterium bovis Isolates and a Comparison with Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Typing

Common strain typing methods for differentiation of Mycobacterium bovis isolates include restriction endonuclease analysis (REA), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, spoligotyping, and, more recently, mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit-variable-number tandem-repeat (MIRU-VNTR) typing. MIRU-VNTR typing and spoligotyping were evaluated in this study, and these typing methods were compared with RFLP typing. A total of 386 M. bovis isolates from cattle, badgers, and deer in the Republic of Ireland that had previously been typed by IS6110, polymorphic GC-rich sequence (PGRS), and direct-repeat (DR) RFLP were included in the study. Spoligotyping and analysis of six VNTR loci (QUB 11a, QUB 11b, ETR A, 4052, MIRU 26, and 1895) were performed on the samples. RFLP analysis was the method that gave the greatest differentiation of strains, with a Hunter-Gaston discriminatory index (HGDI) of 0.927; the HGDI recorded for MIRU-VNTR typing was marginally lower at 0.918, and spoligotyping was the least discriminatory method, with an HGDI of 0.7. Spoligotype SB0140 represented approximately 50% of the isolates. Within the group of isolates represented by SB0140, there was a much lower level of concordance between RFLP and MIRU-VNTR typing than for groups represented by other spoligotypes. A combination of spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR typing offered advantages over MIRU-VNTR typing alone. In a combined spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR typing protocol, the number of VNTR loci could be reduced to four (QUB 11a, QUB 11b, ETR A, and 4052) while maintaining a high level of strain differentiation.The development of molecular techniques for differentiation of Mycobacterium bovis isolates has been of considerable benefit in epidemiological studies. Typing methods that have been commonly used include restriction endonuclease analysis (REA), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, spoligotyping, and, more recently, mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit-variable-number tandem-repeat (MIRU-VNTR) typing (7, 19).RFLP analysis of M. bovis isolates has commonly utilized polymorphism of the insertion sequence IS6110 and repetitive DNA elements such as the polymorphic GC-rich sequence (PGRS) and the direct-repeat (DR) region. Analysis of polymorphism of IS6110, the PGRS, and the DR region in combination has provided a high level of discrimination between strains (7, 19). REA has been widely used in New Zealand and has also given excellent resolution of strains (4). However, both RFLP analysis and REA require relatively large quantities of DNA and are laborious and time-consuming procedures. Complex banding patterns make analysis and interlaboratory comparisons difficult. Spoligotyping is a PCR-based typing method that reveals the presence or absence of unique spacer sequences located between the direct-repeat sequences of the DR region (12). It is a relatively easy procedure to perform, and the results can be expressed in a digital format. However, spoligotyping does not differentiate M. bovis strains to the same extent as RFLP analysis or REA (7, 19). Minisatellite-like loci in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex genome, described as mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units, may show polymorphism of the number of tandem repeats. A wide range of M. tuberculosis complex MIRU-VNTR loci have been evaluated, and loci which are informative for M. bovis isolates have been identified (8, 16, 17, 20, 23). Similar to spoligotyping, MIRU-VNTR typing has the advantages of ease of procedure and the generation of results in a digital format.In recent years, genotyping by IS6110, PGRS, and DR RFLP has been used in epidemiological studies of M. bovis infection in the Republic of Ireland (5, 6, 14). While RFLP analysis has given a high level of strain differentiation, its replacement by MIRU-VNTR typing or by a combination of MIRU-VNTR typing and spoligotyping offers potential advantages. The objective of this study was to evaluate MIRU-VNTR typing or a combination of MIRU-VNTR typing and spoligotyping for discrimination of M. bovis strains, to compare the discriminatory powers of the two methods against RFLP analysis, and to investigate the level of concordance between the three typing systems.