首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

玻璃体切割联合内界膜覆盖术治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离
引用本文:郑华宾,韩彦辉,孟繁超,李丽,孟东方,王东林. 玻璃体切割联合内界膜覆盖术治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2022, 22(12): 2087-2090
作者姓名:郑华宾  韩彦辉  孟繁超  李丽  孟东方  王东林
作者单位:中国山东省济南市,济南明水眼科医院,中国山东省济南市,济南明水眼科医院,中国山东省济南市,济南明水眼科医院,中国山东省济南市,济南明水眼科医院,中国山东省济南市,济南明水眼科医院,中国山东省济南市,济南明水眼科医院
摘    要:目的:比较玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术或内界膜覆盖术治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离(MHRD)的疗效。方法:回顾性临床研究。选取2020-01/2021-06于我院行玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术或内界膜覆盖术治疗的高度近视MHRD患者38例38眼,根据手术方式分为对照组(行玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术)和观察组(行玻璃体切割联合内界膜覆盖术)。随访至术后3mo,比较两组患者手术时间、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、黄斑裂孔闭合和视网膜复位情况。结果:两组患者手术时间无差异(30.71±4.55min vs 35.20±5.44min,P=0.384)。末次随访时,两组患者BCVA均较术前明显改善(均P<0.01),但两组患者BCVA(LogMAR)无差异(1.39±0.24 vs 1.46±0.27,P=0.700);观察组患者黄斑裂孔闭合率高于对照组(100%vs 71%,P=0.024),但两组患者视网膜再脱离率比较无差异(0 vs 10%,P=0.492)。结论:两种手术方式均可改善患者视力,但玻璃体切割联合内界膜覆盖术后黄斑裂孔闭合率更高。

关 键 词:高度近视  黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离  玻璃体切割  内界膜覆盖  内界膜剥除
收稿时间:2022-03-09
修稿时间:2022-11-15

Pars plana vitrectomy combined with inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for the treatment of macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia
Hua-Bin Zheng,Yan-Hui Han,Fan-Chao Meng,Li Li,Dong-Fang Meng and Dong-Lin Wang. Pars plana vitrectomy combined with inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for the treatment of macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia[J]. International Eye Science, 2022, 22(12): 2087-2090
Authors:Hua-Bin Zheng  Yan-Hui Han  Fan-Chao Meng  Li Li  Dong-Fang Meng  Dong-Lin Wang
Affiliation:Jinan Mingshui Eye Hospital, Jinan 250200, Shandong Province, China,Jinan Mingshui Eye Hospital, Jinan 250200, Shandong Province, China,Jinan Mingshui Eye Hospital, Jinan 250200, Shandong Province, China,Jinan Mingshui Eye Hospital, Jinan 250200, Shandong Province, China,Jinan Mingshui Eye Hospital, Jinan 250200, Shandong Province, China and Jinan Mingshui Eye Hospital, Jinan 250200, Shandong Province, China
Abstract:AIM: To compare the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy(PPV)combined with internal limiting membrane(ILM)peeling or inverted ILM flap for the treatment of macular hole retinal detachment(MHRD)in high myopia.

METHODS: A retrospective clinical study. A total of 38 cases(38 eyes)with MHRD in high myopia were treated with PPV combined with ILM peeling or PPV combined with inverted ILM flap in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2021. They were divided into control group(PPV combined with ILM peeling)and observation group(PPV combined with inverted ILM flap)according to the surgical method. Follow-up to 3mo after surgery, the surgery time, best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), the rate of macular hole closure and retinal reattachment were compared between two groups.

RESULTS: The surgery time of two groups were compared and there were no statistically significant difference(30.71±4.55min vs. 35.20±5.44min, P=0.384). The BCVA in the two groups were significantly improved at the last follow-up(all P<0.01). But there was no difference in the postoperative BCVA(LogMAR)of the two groups(1.39±0.24 vs. 1.46±0.27, P=0.700). The rate of macular hole closure in the observation group was higher than that of control group(100% vs. 71%, P=0.024). There was no difference in the rate of recurrent retinal detachment of the patients in two groups(0 vs. 10%, P=0.492).

CONCLUSION: Both surgeries can improve the BCVA, while PPV combined with inverted ILM flap has higher rate of macular hole closure.

Keywords:high myopia   macular hole retinal detachment   pars plana vitrectomy   inverted internal limiting membrane flap   internal limiting membrane peeling
点击此处可从《国际眼科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《国际眼科杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号