首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

我院3种口服降糖药治疗2型糖尿病的成本-效果分析
引用本文:吴瀛达,蒋剑梅. 我院3种口服降糖药治疗2型糖尿病的成本-效果分析[J]. 海峡药学, 2006, 18(5): 170-172
作者姓名:吴瀛达  蒋剑梅
作者单位:浙江温州医学院附属二院药剂科,温州,325027
摘    要:目的评价我院3种口服降糖药治疗2型糖尿病的临床效果,并探讨其经济学效果。方法选择102例2型糖尿病患者随机分成3组,A组:格列美脲口服:B组:吡格列酮口服;C组:二甲双胍口服,2个月后比较临床效果并进行成本效果分析。结果3种方案的总成本分别为570.40元、596.30元、498.10元;成本效果比分别为6.42、7.07、5.21。结论C组方案为最佳方案。

关 键 词:成本-效果分析  2型糖尿病  格列美脲  吡格列酮  二甲双胍
文章编号:1006-3765(2006)05-0170-03

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Three Kinds of Oral Hypoglycemic Drugs for Treating Type-2 DM in our Hospital
WU Ying-da,JIANG Jian-mei. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Three Kinds of Oral Hypoglycemic Drugs for Treating Type-2 DM in our Hospital[J]. Strait Pharmaceutical Journal, 2006, 18(5): 170-172
Authors:WU Ying-da  JIANG Jian-mei
Affiliation:Dept. of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325027 China
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical and economic effects of three hypoglycemic drugs for type-2 DM.METHODS 102cases of type-2 DM patients were divided randomly into 4 groups,group A:glimepiride po;group B:pioglitazone po;group C:metformin po.The clinical effects were compared and the cost-effectiveness analysis was used after 2 months.RESULTS The costs of three schemes were 570.40 yuans,596.40 yuans and 398.10 yuans,the cost-effectiveness ratios were 6.42,7.07 and 5.21.CONCLUSION Group C is the best scheme.
Keywords:Cost-effectiveness analysis  Type-DM  Glimepiride  Piolitazone  Metrormin
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号