首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Editorial: review and commentary section
Authors:Lavigne John V
Institution:1Children's Memorial Hospital, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University and 2Mary Ann and J. Milburn Smith Child Health Research Program, Children's Memorial Research Center

All corresspondence concerning this article should be addressed to John V. Lavigne, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Children's Memorial Hospital (#10), 2300 Children's Plaza, Chicago, Illinois, USA. E-mail: jlavigne@childrensmemorial.org.

Abstract:Is this the era of empirically supported practice? If it isnot, it is up to us to make it so. Many of us were trained inthe scientist–practitioner framework of the Boulder model,now almost 60 years old, which emphasized training in both researchand practice for clinical psychologists, and which seems tomake the implicit assumption that the "science" training wouldhelp to make the "practice" activities more empirically-based.Almost 60 years later, we now have a greater appreciation forthe difficulties of translating research into practice. As complicatedas it may be to integrate science and practice into a singlecareer, it may be even more difficult to find ways to have scienceinfuse our clinical activities so that the knowledge base ofclinical psychology guides our clinical work whenever possible. Currently,
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed Oxford 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号