首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Availability of New Medicaid Patient Appointments and the Role of Rural Health Clinics
Authors:Michael R. Richards M.D.   Ph.D.   M.P.H.  Brendan Saloner Ph.D.  Genevieve M. Kenney Ph.D.  Karin V. Rhodes M.D.   M.S.  Daniel Polsky Ph.D.
Affiliation:1. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Colonial Penn Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA;2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD;3. Health Policy Center, Urban Institute, Washington, DC;4. Perelman School of Medicine, Center for Emergency Care Policy & Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA;5. Wharton School and Perelman School of Medicine, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Colonial Penn Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Abstract:

Objective

To examine the willingness to accept new Medicaid patients among certified rural health clinics (RHCs) and other nonsafety net rural providers.

Data Sources

Experimental (audit) data from a 10‐state study of primary care practices, county‐level information from the Area Health Resource File, and RHC information from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Study Design

We generate appointment rates for rural and nonrural areas by patient‐payer type (private, Medicaid, self‐pay) to then motivate our focus on within‐rural variation by clinic type (RHC vs. non‐RHC). Multivariate linear models test for statistical differences and assess the estimates’ sensitivity to the inclusion of control variables.

Data Collection

The primary data are from a large field study.

Principal Findings

Approximately 80 percent of Medicaid callers receive an appointment in rural areas—a rate more than 20 percentage points greater than nonrural areas. Importantly, within rural areas, RHCs offer appointments to prospective Medicaid patients nearly 95 percent of the time, while the rural (nonsafety net) non‐RHC Medicaid rate is less than 75 percent. Measured differences are robust to covariate adjustment.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that RHC status, with its alternative payment model, is strongly associated with new Medicaid patient acceptance. Altering RHC financial incentives may have consequences for rural Medicaid enrollees.
Keywords:Medicaid  rural health care  rural health clinics  primary care  audit methodology
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号