中文版儿童心理行为障碍偏见量表信效度初探

目的 修订、引进儿童心理行为障碍偏见量表(BTCWPABDS),并评价其在我国的信效度。方法 对英文版BTCWPABDS进行系统评价和翻译,应用中文版BTCWPABDS对415名医务人员、教师及其他社会人员进行问卷调查,并对调查结果进行统计分析。结果 修订后中文版BTCWPABDS包含20个条目;总量表的Cronbach' s α系数为0.83,量表总的重测信度为0.76(P<0.01)。探索性因子分析共提取出两个因子,条目的因子负荷为0.26~0.66(P<0.05),两个因子的组合信度分别为0.81、0.66;验证性因素分析表明2因素模型拟合良好:NFI=0.84,IFI=0.93,TLI=0.90,CFI=0.93,χ²/df=1.67,RMSEA=0.048,均符合测量学要求。结论 中文版BTCWPABDS具有良好的信度和效度,可作为测评不同人群对心理行为障碍儿童的偏见态度的评估工具。

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Biases Toward Children With Psychological and Behavioral Disorders Scale.

Objective To translate and establish the reliability and validity of Chinese version of Biases Toward Children with Psychological and Behavioral Disorders Scale(BTCW PABOS). Methods By forward and back forward translation of this scale from English into Chinese,a cross-sectional survey was conducted to explore its reliability and validity among Chinese medical staff,teachers and social workers. Results A total of 415 participants joined in this study.The Chinese version of this scale consists of 20 items.The Cronbach's α coefficient for BTCWPABDS was 0.83 and the test-retest reliabilities of the whole scale was 0.76 after two weeks.Construct validity of this scale was established by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).By EFA,there were two-factor resolution and its factor loadings ranged from 0.26~0.66.The composite reliabilities of two factors were 0.81,0.66.By CFA,these two factor model fitted well:NFI=0.84,IFI=0.93,TLI=0.90,CFI=0.93,χ²/df=1.67,RMSEA=0.048,all met the criteria standards for adequacy of fit. Conclusion The Chinese version of BTCWPABDS had good reliability and validity to evaluate the bias toward children with psychological and behavior disorders.