手法复位与传统牵引肩关节脱位整复的疗效比较

目的通过对肩关节脱位整复不同方法与传统牵引方法的比较,探讨快速的复位方法。方法回顾性分析传统牵引方法与Eskimo法和Hippocratesi法整复治疗肩关节脱位的治疗效果。结果A组(Eskimo法)46例患者一次性复位成功45例,占97.8%,2次性复位成功2例,占4.4%:B组(Hippocratesi法)46例患者一次性复位成功38例,占79.1%,2次性复位成功8例,占20.9%:对照组88例患者一次性复位成功54例,占61.5%,2次性复位成功34例,占38.5%。结论手法复位优于传统牵引方法,且两种手法复位相比,Eskimo法疗效更可靠。

Comparison of the Curative Effect between Manipulative Reduction and Traditional Drawing in Restituting Shoulder Joint Dislocation

Objective To compare the curative effect between manipulative reduction and traditional drawing restitution of shoulder joint dislocation.Methods The curative effects of traditional drawing,Eskimo's method and Hippocratesi'method in restituting shoulder joint dislocation were analyzed retrospectively.Results 46 cases in Group A received Eskimo'method,out of the 46,45 cases succeeded in reposition with only one act(97.8%) and 2 cases with two acts(4.4%).46 cases in Group B received Hoppocratesi's method,out of the 46 cases,38 cases succeeded jn reposition with one act(79.1%)and 8 cases with two acts(20.9%).0ut of the 88 cases in the control group,54 cases succeeded in reposition with one act(6 1.5%)and 34 cases with two acts(38.5%).Conclusions Manipulative reduction is superior to traditional drawing and the curative effect of Eskimo's method is more reliable.