Comparison of the long-term efficacy of implantable defibrillators and sotalol for documented spontaneous sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias secondary to coronary artery disease

Background: The relative efficacy of antitachycardia pacing implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ATPICD) and sotalol in the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias is controversial. Aim: To compare the mortality in patients treated with ATPICD and sotalol for documented spontaneous sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurring late after previous myocardial infarction. Methods: In this non-randomised retrospective study of 139 consecutive patients all patients had inducible ventricular tachycardia at baseline electrophysiological studies. Before the availability of ATPICD, 22 patients were treated with sotalol as part of a randomised study comparing the efficacy of sotalol to amiodarone. After ATPICD became available sotalol was used in 49 patients in whom intravenous testing predicted sotalol to be effective and ATPICD were implanted in 68 patients in whom sotalol was predicted to be ineffective at electrophysiological testing. Thus, 68 patients were treated with an ATPICD and 71 with sotalol. Results: The two groups were well-matched for age, type of presenting arrhythmia, severity of coronary artery disease and ventricular function. At 36 months Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality from ventricular tachyarrhythmia were 0% with ATPICD and 15% with sotalol (p=0.03). Kaplan-Meier estimates of total mortality at 36 months were 12% with ATPICD and 25% with sotalol (p=0.09). Multivariate analysis showed hazard ratio of 7.9 (p=0.06) for death from ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients treated with sotalol compared to ATPICD. Conclusions: While no difference in total mortality was demonstrated, treatment with ATPICD is probably superior to sotalol for preventing deaths due to ventricular tachyarrhythmia. (Aust NZ J Med 1999; 29: 331–341.)