首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Distinct effects of ω-toxins and various groups of Ca-entry inhibitors on nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and Ca channels of chromaffin cells
Authors:Mercedes Villarroya   Marí  a-Teresa De la Fuente   Manuela G. L  pez   Luis Gandí  a  Antonio G. Garcí  a
Affiliation:

a Departamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Arzobispo Morcillo 4, 28029 Madrid, Spain

b Servicio de Farmacología Clínica and Instituto de Gerontología, Hospital de la Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Diego de León 62, 28006 Madrid, Spain

Abstract:The effects of ω-toxins and various Ca2+ antagonist subtypes on the 45Ca2+ entry into bovine adrenal medullary chromaffin cells stimulated via nicotinic acetylcholine receptors or via direct depolarization with K+, have been compared. The conditions selected to stimulate the 45Ca2+ entry consisted of a 60-s period of exposure of cells to 100 μM of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist dimethylphenylpiperazinium or to 70 mM K+. The N-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel blockers ω-conotoxin GVIA and MVIIA (1 μM) inhibited 45Ca2+ entry stimulated by dimethylphenylpiperazinium or K+ by around 25–30%. The P-type Ca2+ channel blocker ω-agatoxin IVA (10 nM) did not affect the dimethylphenylpiperazinium nor the K+ responses; 1 μM (Q-channel blockade) inhibited both responses by around 50%. The N/P/Q-type Ca2+ channel blocker ω-conotoxin MVIIC (1 μM) inhibited the K+ evoked 45Ca2+ entry by 70%, while dimethylphenylpiperazinium was blocked by 50% (P<0.001). The L-type Ca2+ channel blockers nifedipine, furnidipine, diltiazem or verapamil (3 μM each) inhibited much more the dimethylphenylpiperazinium than the K+ response. The dimethylphenylpiperazinium signal was blocked 71, 88, 89, and 53%, respectively, by nifedipine, furnidipine, diltiazem and verapamil, and the K+ response by 38, 29, 22, and 10%. Combined ω-conotoxin MVIIC (1 μM) and furnidipine (3 μM) blocked 100% of the K+ evoked 45Ca2+ entry. However, combined ω-conotoxin GVIA (1 μM), and furnidipine left unblocked 50% of the K+ response. The ‘wide spectrum' Ca2+ channel antagonists flunarizine or dotarizine (3 μM each) blocked the dimethylphenylpiperazinium and the K+ responses to a similar extent (50%); cinnarizine (3 μM) inhibited more the dimethylphenylpiperazinium (82%) than the K+ response (21%). At 3 μM, the highly lipophilic β-adrenoceptor antagonist (±)-propranolol, reduced by 68% the dimethylphenylpiperazinium signal and by 23% the K+ signal. Other high lipophilic β-adrenoceptor antagonists such as metoprolol and labetalol, reduced little the dimethylphenylpiperazinium and the K+ responses. The highly lipophilic agent penfluridol blocked the dimethylphenylpiperazinium response by 30% and the K+ response by 50%. One of the least lipophilic compounds tested, (+)-lubeluzole, blocked by 40% the dimethylphenylpiperazinium and the K+ responses. These data are compatible with the idea that the various ω-toxin peptides used to separate pharmacologically the different voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels expressed by neurones, do not block the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ion channel. In contrast the L-type Ca2+ channel blockers do block the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ionophore. Lipophilicity of the compounds is not a requirement for Ca2+ channel or nicotinic acetylcholine receptor blockade.
Keywords:ω-Toxin   Ca2+ channel   Neuronal nicotinic receptor   Ca2+ channel antagonist   Chromaffin cell
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号