Desflurane compared with propofol for postoperative sedation in the intensive care unit

Background. We hypothesized that emergence from sedation inpostoperative patients in the intensive care unit would be fasterand more predictable after sedation with desflurane than withpropofol. Methods. Sixty patients after major operations were allocatedrandomly to receive either desflurane or propofol. The targetlevel of sedation was defined by a bispectral index^TM (BIS^TM)of 60. All patients were receiving mechanical ventilation ofthe lungs for 10.6 (SD 5.5) h depending on their clinical state.The study drugs were stopped abruptly in a calm atmosphere withthe fresh gas flow set to 6 litres min^–1, and the timeuntil the BIS increased above 75 was measured (t_BIS75, the mainobjective measure). After extubation of the trachea, when thepatients could state their birth date, they were asked to memorizefive words. Results. Emergence times were shorter (P<0.001) after desfluranethan after propofol (25th, 50th and 75th percentiles): t_BIS75,3.0, 4.5 and 5.8 vs 5.2, 7.7 and 10.3 min; time to first response,3.7, 5.0 and 5.7 vs 6.9, 8.6 and 10.7 min; time to eyes open,4.7, 5.7 and 8.0 vs 7.3, 10.5 and 20.8 min; time to squeezehand, 5.1, 6.5 and 10.2 vs 9.2, 11.1 and 21.1 min; time to trachealextubation, 5.8, 7.7 and 10.0 vs 9.7, 13.5 and 18.9 min; timeto saying their birth date, 7.7, 10.5 and 15.5 vs 13.0, 19.4and 31.8 min. Patients who received desflurane recalled significantlymore of the five words. We did not observe major side-effectsand there were no haemodynamic or laboratory changes exceptfor a more marked increase in systolic blood pressure afterstopping desflurane. Using a low fresh gas flow (air/oxygen1 litre min^–1), pure drug costs were lower for desfluranethan for propofol (95 vs 171 Euros day^–1). Conclusions. We found shorter and more predictable emergencetimes and quicker mental recovery after short-term postoperativesedation with desflurane compared with propofol. Desfluraneallows precise timing of extubation, shortening the time duringwhich the patient needs very close attention. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 273–80