Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes |
| |
Authors: | Zeinab Esmaeilpour Paola Marangolo Benjamin M. Hampstead Sven Bestmann Elisabeth Galletta Helena Knotkova Marom Bikson |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York of CUNY, New York, NY 10031, USA;2. Biomedical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran;3. Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici, University Federico II, Naples and IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome Italy;4. VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA;5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA;6. Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK;g. Rusk Rehabilitation Medicine, New York University Langone Medical Center, USA;h. MJHS Institute for Innovation in Palliative Care, New York, NY, USA;i. Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, The Bronx, NY, USA |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is investigated to modulate neuronal function by applying a fixed low-intensity direct current to scalp.ObjectivesWe critically discuss evidence for a monotonic response in effect size with increasing current intensity, with a specific focus on a question if increasing applied current enhance the efficacy of tDCS.MethodsWe analyzed tDCS intensity does-response from different perspectives including biophysical modeling, animal modeling, human neurophysiology, neuroimaging and behavioral/clinical measures. Further, we discuss approaches to design dose-response trials.ResultsPhysical models predict electric field in the brain increases with applied tDCS intensity. Data from animal studies are lacking since a range of relevant low-intensities is rarely tested. Results from imaging studies are ambiguous while human neurophysiology, including using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a probe, suggests a complex state-dependent non-monotonic dose response. The diffusivity of brain current flow produced by conventional tDCS montages complicates this analysis, with relatively few studies on focal High Definition (HD)-tDCS. In behavioral and clinical trials, only a limited range of intensities (1-2?mA), and typically just one intensity, are conventionally tested; moreover, outcomes are subject brain-state dependent. Measurements and models of current flow show that for the same applied current, substantial differences in brain current occur across individuals. Trials are thus subject to inter-individual differences that complicate consideration of population-level dose response.ConclusionThe presence or absence of simple dose response does not impact how efficacious a given tDCS dose is for a given indication. Understanding dose-response in human applications of tDCS is needed for protocol optimization including individualized dose to reduce outcome variability, which requires intelligent design of dose-response studies. |
| |
Keywords: | Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) Dose-response Neuromodulation Dose-control |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|