Two-year clinical evaluation of nonvital tooth whitening and resin composite restorations

Background: Adhesive systems, resin composites, and light curing systems underwent continuous improvement in the past decade. The number of patients asking for ultraconservative treatments is increasing; clinicians are starting to reevaluate the dogma of traditional restorative dentistry and look for alternative methods to build up severely destroyed teeth. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of nonvital tooth whitening and the clinical performance of direct composite restorations used to reconstruct extensive restorations on endodontically bleached teeth. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐one patients 18 years or older were included in this clinical trial, and 26 endodontically treated and bleached maxillary and mandibular teeth were restored using a microhybrid resin composite. Patients with severe internal (tetracycline stains) and external discoloration (fluorosis), smokers, and pregnant and nursing women were excluded from the study. Only patients with A3 or darker shades were included. Teeth having endodontic access opening only to be restored were excluded; conversely, teeth having a combination of endodontic access and Class III/IV cavities were included in the study. A Vita shade guide (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Sackingen, Germany) arranged by value order was used to record the shade for each patient. Temporary or existing restorations were removed, along with a 1 mm gutta‐percha below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), and a resin‐modified glass ionomer barrier was placed at the CEJ. Bleaching treatment was performed using a combination of in‐office (Opalescencextra, Ultradent Products, South Jordan, UT, USA) and at‐home (Opalescence 10% PF, Ultradent Products) applications. Two weeks after completion of the bleaching, the teeth were restored using a combination of PQ1 adhesive system and Vit‐1‐escence microhybrid resin composite (Ultradent Products). Wedge‐shaped increments were placed and cured using the VIP Light (Bisco, Inc Schaumburg, IL, USA) through a combination of pulse and progressive curing techniques. Results: All but one restoration were evaluated by two independent evaluators every 6 months during a 2‐year period using modified US Public Health Service criteria. No restoration failed and “alpha” scores were recorded for all parameters but color stability, which was scored “bravo”. Analysis of variance showed a significant shade change between baseline (mean = 14.4 ± 1.9) versus 2 weeks (mean = 1.6 ± 0.7) and 2 years (mean = 2.8 ± 1.7) (p < .0001). Although a significant shade change was observed between 2 weeks and the 2‐year follow‐up (p= .008), no significant difference was reported between the baseline and 2 weeks (12.9 ± 2) versus baseline and 2 years (11.9 ± 2.3). Conclusions: Significant tooth lightening was reported after the completion of whitening therapy on devitalized teeth; shade rebound was reported in less than 50% of the treated teeth and was limited to a maximum of four shades. A microhybrid resin composite demonstrated excellent clinical performance in the restoration of all endodontically treated and bleached teeth after a 2‐year evaluation period.