首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统阑尾切除术临床比较分析
引用本文:龚南雄,李震宇,杜玉辉,卢懿明.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统阑尾切除术临床比较分析[J].中国医药导报,2008,5(9):42-43.
作者姓名:龚南雄  李震宇  杜玉辉  卢懿明
作者单位:遵义医药高等专科学校附属医院腹腔镜中心,贵州遵义,563003
摘    要:目的:探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)与传统阑尾切除术(CA)的优缺点。方法:回顾性分析2003年4月~2007年4月,按意愿随机进行LA和CA的120例阑尾炎患者的临床资料。结果:两组手术时间无差异(P〉0.05),住院费用相似(P〉0.05),腹腔镜组住院时间短(P〈0.05),术后并发症少。结论:与CA比较,LA具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少等优点,是一种安全、理想的手术方式。

关 键 词:腹腔镜阑尾切除术  传统阑尾切除术  阑尾炎  对比分析
文章编号:1673-7210(2008)03(c)-042-02
修稿时间:2008年1月4日

The clinical contrastive analysis between the laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional appendectomy
GONG Nan-Xiong,LI Zhen-yu,DU Yu-hui,LU Yi-ming.The clinical contrastive analysis between the laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional appendectomy[J].China Medical Herald,2008,5(9):42-43.
Authors:GONG Nan-Xiong  LI Zhen-yu  DU Yu-hui  LU Yi-ming
Institution:(Laparoscopic Center, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Institute of Health Sciences,Zunyi 563003,China)
Abstract:Objective:To explore the merits and defects of laparoscopic appendectomy(LA)and those of conventional appendectomy(CA).Methods:120 cases were performed LA or CA at random.The clinical data of two methods were summarized and contrasted from April 2003 to April 2007.Results:There was no deference between two methods in the mean operative time and the mean expenditure.LA had much less mean postoperative hospital stay and rate of complications than CA.Conclusion:It is no doubt that LA have many advantages obviously compare with CA.LA has advantages of little invasion,rapid recovery and fewer complications,it is a safe and ideal surgical alternative.
Keywords:Laparoscopic appendectomy  Conventional appendectomy  Contrastive analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号