首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

口腔金属材料安全性、相容性以及功能性的评价
引用本文:于 华,张晓东,王亦菁,魏 静,刘佼佼. 口腔金属材料安全性、相容性以及功能性的评价[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2012, 16(47): 8907-8914. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2012.47.032
作者姓名:于 华  张晓东  王亦菁  魏 静  刘佼佼
作者单位:解放军沈阳军区总医院口腔内科,辽宁省沈阳市 110000
摘    要:背景:口腔固定修复金属材料在人体内会对机体产生一定的影响,因此选择最佳的口腔生物材料可以减少对人体的损害。目的:分析不同口腔修复固定金属材料的生物性能,为口腔生物材料的选择提供辅助信息。方法:研究分析各种常用口腔修复固定金属材料的生物学性能,包括摩擦学性能、细胞相容性以及耐腐蚀性能,并比较各种口腔修复固定材料的生物学性能,以明确最佳的口腔生物材料选择应用。结果与结论:以金、钛为基质的合金材料表现出较高的生物性能,从抗摩擦性能、细胞相容性以及耐腐蚀性能均表现出较好的生物相容性,而银钯合金、钴铬合金的生物相容性与纯钛和金、钛合金相比较略低,镍铬合金的生物相容性最差,因此在进行口腔修复固定材料选择时,应选取以金、钛为基质的合金材料以及纯钛,尽量避免选择镍铬合金材料。

关 键 词:口腔  金属材料  固定  修复  摩擦磨损  细胞相容性  耐腐蚀性  金合金  金铂合金  钛合金  纯钛  钴铬合金  镍铬合金  细胞周期  唾液  
收稿时间:2012-08-04

Safety,compatibility and function of metallic dental materials
Yu Hua,Zhang Xiao-dong,Wang Yi-jing,Wei Jing,Liu Jiao-jiao. Safety,compatibility and function of metallic dental materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2012, 16(47): 8907-8914. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2012.47.032
Authors:Yu Hua  Zhang Xiao-dong  Wang Yi-jing  Wei Jing  Liu Jiao-jiao
Affiliation:Department of Stomatology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang 110000, Liaoning Province, China
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Fixed metallic dental materials have a certain effect on organism in the body. Thus, to select an optimal biomaterial can reduce the damage to human body.OBJECTIVE:To analyze the biological properties of different fixed metallic dental materials and to provide information for selecting a suitable biological material.METHODS:This study analyzed the biological properties of various fixed metallic dental materials, including tribological property, cell compatibility and corrosion resistance, as well as compared the biological properties of various fixed metallic dental materials to identify the optimal material.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Alloy material using gold and titanium as matrix showed high biological properties and high biocompatibility from the aspects of tribological property, cell compatibility and corrosion resistance. However, the biocompatibility of silver-palladium alloy and cobalt-chromium alloy was slightly lower compared with pure titanium alloy and titanium alloy. The biocompatibility of nickel-chromium alloy was poorest. Therefore, we should select alloy material using gold and titanium as matrix and pure titanium, and try to avoid nickel-chromium alloy material.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《中国组织工程研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国组织工程研究》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号