首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

化学疗法与核素治疗多发骨转移癌疗效对比
引用本文:谢爱民,莫逆,叶旭.化学疗法与核素治疗多发骨转移癌疗效对比[J].广州医学院学报,2008,36(5):33-35.
作者姓名:谢爱民  莫逆  叶旭
作者单位:湖南省肿瘤医院核医学科,湖南,长沙,410006
摘    要:目的:观察化学疗法及核素治疗骨转移癌的疗效。方法:对骨转移癌患者分别予以化学疗法及核素治疗,观察不同方法的疗效。结果:化学疗法治疗组中骨痛的缓解率分别是完全缓解(CR)0%,部分缓解(PR)8.3%;骨显像的变化是CR0%,PR7.7%,稳定0%;而核素治疗骨转移癌的疗效明确,骨痛的缓解率达到70.3%,骨显像异常浓聚点虽然CR为0%,但PR为45.9%,稳定为43.3%。结论:核素治疗骨转移疗效明确,其中^153Sm—EDTMP疗效更优于^89SrCl2。

关 键 词:放射性核素  治疗  化学疗法  肿瘤转移  钐153-乙二胺四亚基膦酸  氯化锶89  核素浓聚点

Treatment Efficacy of Chemotherapy VS Radionuclide Therapy in Multiple Bone Metastasis
XIE Ai-min,MO Ni,YE Xu.Treatment Efficacy of Chemotherapy VS Radionuclide Therapy in Multiple Bone Metastasis[J].Academic Journal of Guangzhou Medical College,2008,36(5):33-35.
Authors:XIE Ai-min  MO Ni  YE Xu
Institution:(Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha 410006, Hunan, China)
Abstract:Objective: To observe the treatment efficacy of chemotherapy vs radionuclide therapy in multiple bone metastasis. Methods: A cohort of patients with multiple bone metastasis were randomized to receive chemotherapy or radionuclide therapy. Treatment efficacy of these two modalities were compared between the groups. Results: Chemotherapy resulted in relief of osteodynia with 0% by complete remission(CR) and 8.3% by partial remission(PR), and improvement of bone imaging with 0% by CR, 7.7% by PR and 0% by stability (ST). On the other hand, radionuclide therapy significantly resulted in 70.3% relief of osteodynia. While the improvement of abnormal nuclide accumulations in bone images was 0% by CR, the PR was 45.9% and ST was 43.3%. Conclusion: Radionuclide therapy appeared to provide more demonstrated efficacy for treatment of multiple bone metastasis. ^153Sm-EDTMP resulted in more favorable outcomes as compared with ^89SrCl2.
Keywords:radionuclide  therapy  chemotherapy  neoplasm metastasis  ^153Sm- EDTMP  ^89SrCl2  nuclide accumulation focus
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号