Clinical impact of bulky mass in the patient with primary extranodal diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP therapy |
| |
Authors: | Moo-Kon Song Joo-Seop Chung Oh Sung-Yong Gyeong-Won Lee Seung-Geun Kim Young-Mi Seol Ho-Jin Shin Young-Jin Choi Goon-Jae Cho Dong-Hoon Shin Eun-Young Yun |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Hematology-Oncology, Busan National Cancer Center, Pusan National University Hospital Medical Research Institute, Busan, South Korea 6. Department of Hematology–Oncology, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, 1-10 Ami-dong, Seo-gu, Busan, 602-739, Republic of Korea 2. Department of Hematology–Oncology, School of Medicine, Dong-A University Medical Center, Busan, South Korea 3. Department of Hematology–Oncology, School of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, South Korea 4. Department of Pathology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea 5. Department of Statistics, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea
|
| |
Abstract: | Although numerous studies about primary extranodal diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) were reported sporadically, the literature of clinical value of immunophenotype and bulky diameter in rituximab era is limited. Ninety-six patients with primary extranodal DLBCL receiving R-CHOP therapy were analyzed to evaluate whether immunophenotype and size of bulky disease are significantly important. The International Prognostic Index was still an important prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS; p?=?0.003, p?=?0.027). Difference of survival between germinal center (GC) type and non-GC type was not different (PFS: p?=?0.192; OS: p?=?0.197). In two separated groups according to extranodal maximum tumor diameter (EN-MTD) 7.5 cm as cutoff value for survival, the group of EN-MTD ≥7.5 cm had lower PFS and OS than <7.5 cm (PFS: p?=?0.001; OS: p?=?0.008). In four divided subgroups according to EN-MTD combined with immunophenotype, the subgroup of non-GC type with EN-MTD ≥ 7.5 cm had lower PFS and OS compared with the other subgroups (PFS: p?0.001; OS: p?=?0.008). Multivariate analysis revealed that non-GC with EN-MTD ≥ 7.5 cm was an independent prognostic parameter (PFS: HR?=?5.407, 95%CI?=?2.378–12.294, p?0.001; OS: HR?=?4.136, 95%CI?=?1.721–9.941, p?=?0.002). Bulky primary extranodal DLBCL would be associated with unfavorable outcome especially in non-GC type. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|